Live data from Hacker News

Seafood Without the Sea: Will Lab-Grown Fish Hook Consumers?

npr.org

41–43 of 43 posts

Re: Seafood Without the Sea: Will Lab-Grown Fish Hook Consumers?

#41
post #38

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm not impressed with academics who think all physical labor is torture. NOT EVERYONE IS LIKE YOU OR WANT TO BE LIKE YOU! Sorry for the shouting...

This wouldn't stop somebody from fishing for fun/sport, unless you're saying it's common that people use industrial fishing equipment for fun.

I'm saying some people actually really enjoy physical outdoor work over sitting behind a desk in an office all day.

Re: Seafood Without the Sea: Will Lab-Grown Fish Hook Consumers?

#42
post #40
post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't think it's inevitable that quality has to deteriorate. I buy all sorts of manufactured products that are perfectly good; competition in balanced, well-run markets keeps producers in line. And personally, I'm willing to pay extra for lab-grown. I'm sure they'll sell that as a health benefit; it's much easier to avoid contaminants. But for me it's about minimized negative externalities. I don't have to worry th…

"And personally, I'm willing to pay extra for lab-grown." I believe this mindset amongst thoughtful consumers like yourself only do harm. Like with other trendy foods that get popularized for health or whatever reason, it incentivizes the producers to raise the prices and when consumers like yourself accept that price, it sends a signal to them. The product then becomes too expensive for regular normal people to affo…

I don't think that's how it works at all.

There are a lot of products that start as a premium offering and move downmarket as they scale. Computers and cellphones are great examples. That early adopters paid a lot for their purchases didn't prevent the emergence of less expensive hardware. It enabled it.

Re: Seafood Without the Sea: Will Lab-Grown Fish Hook Consumers?

#43
post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't think it's inevitable that quality has to deteriorate. I buy all sorts of manufactured products that are perfectly good; competition in balanced, well-run markets keeps producers in line. And personally, I'm willing to pay extra for lab-grown. I'm sure they'll sell that as a health benefit; it's much easier to avoid contaminants. But for me it's about minimized negative externalities. I don't have to worry th…

You may pay extra, plenty might want the same for less - particularly if it becomes fashionable. We don't really have balanced, well run markets, so competition also produces cheap, profitable eco-catastrophes, either to sell a similar product for less - see US experience of beef farming. Or to turn a once wild-caught luxury food into a mass market everyday food - see almost all salmon farming. No problem - the eco-c…

I think it's much harder to have negative externalities in a factory, especially a food factory, than it is operating in the open ocean, or even in, say, coastal fish farms. Food production is pretty regulated, and drain systems are much fussier about what they accept than, say, soil runoff is.

I just don't hear many horror stories about people living next to, say, bakeries.

Post reply on HN