Apple can add feature after feature, but if Music continues to split albums without warning, it's close to useless. I can't curate a music library when I can't rely on my music not being jumbled around. Dropping music for licensing issues is one thing, but messing with metadata is beyond frustrating. For arbitrary reasons, Apple Music will: remove songs from albums and re-add them to your library as the "single" or "…
I agree so much! I switched to Apple Music 2 years ago when my hard drive failed. At the beginning it was alright, very convenient to have (almost) everything available on hand, in the same app as before. But now I can't stand it anymore. I have so many albums that randomly split all the time, version of tracks that change or become unavailable altogether. I'm moving away from streaming and am working on building bac…
Apple Music Announces Spatial Audio and Lossless Audio
381–390 of 717 posts
Re: Apple Music Announces Spatial Audio and Lossless Audio
#382Re: Apple Music Announces Spatial Audio and Lossless Audio
#383Earlier quoted context omitted.
Problem is, sometimes when you learn how to spot a deficiency, you can't unlearn it and stop spotting it. It's like with kerning[0] or image compression artifacts. Everyone has a different level, and I haven't measured mine, but even when casually listening to music - including music from bad speakers in a waiting room somewhere - I can identify too badly compressed music and get immediately annoyed by it. -- [0] - h…
It's like with kerning Kerning is a great comparison, I think. Studies have shown that well-compressed lossy audio is nearly indistinguishable from the originals. This is certainly true for me. I can sometimes pick out the compressed version if I know the track well and can look for specific details, but generally I'm absolutely not consciously aware of any compression artifacts. Similarly, I doubt most people could…
Re: Apple Music Announces Spatial Audio and Lossless Audio
#384If you're interested in what this might sound like (spatial audio) the announcement video uses it. To watch it you need to be using your iOS device + AirPods: https://music.apple.com/gb/music-movie/spatial-audio-on-appl...
I’m on the latest iOS beta with AirPods Pro. In Chrome the media element won’t open. When I open in Safari it takes me to the Apple Music app, which can’t play the trailer because I don’t have an account. It’s like they’re warning me the problems with walled gardens.
Re: Apple Music Announces Spatial Audio and Lossless Audio
#385Earlier quoted context omitted.
Until your streaming service gets sold, goes out of business, "pivots," decides you or your worldviews aren't trendy, thinks you're a hacker, screws up your billing, drops support for your device, or any of the hundreds of other reasons the music suddenly stops.
Sorry, I am just not that paranoid. I had cassettes until the late 90s, CDs until the mid-2000s, and Spotify since then. Spotify isn't going anywhere.
Also, all the people holding onto their 8-tracks are definitely thinking they showed all of us. /s
Re: Apple Music Announces Spatial Audio and Lossless Audio
#386Earlier quoted context omitted.
As mentioned above, ALAC is an open source format, which has all benefits as other open source format e.g. FLAC.
> all benefits as other open source format e.g. FLAC. Except adoption. FLAC is much more widely supported, so why opt for ALAC?
Re: Apple Music Announces Spatial Audio and Lossless Audio
#387From the article: > J Balvin said: [...] With Lossless, everything in the music is going to sound bigger and stronger but more importantly, it will be better quality. [...] There have been tests showing we cannot hear the difference between minimally lossy audio (e.g. mp3 320kbps) and lossless. But Balvin can. And it sounds "bigger and stronger". The extra quality of lossless is nice when mixing/remixing the sound, a…
Bigger. Stronger. Warmer. Not that these cannot meaningfully describe audio. But it tells me they cannot quantify the difference.
Re: Apple Music Announces Spatial Audio and Lossless Audio
#388Earlier quoted context omitted.
Where can I buy CDs of popular music?
CDs of popular music are actually the easiest to find. (Target, Walmart or any big local equivalent will have the top charting artists stocked as CDs) It's the more esoteric artists that have become increasingly difficult to get CDs for. Streaming is really a boon for anything outside the mainstream.
I seem to recall that meant they weren't actually CDs, they just happened to look exactly like them, and usually function in a CD player. Computers often had trouble with them.
I don't know if this is true, or just bs, but there you go.
Re: Apple Music Announces Spatial Audio and Lossless Audio
#389Can't wait to listen to 192kHz/24-bit on my AAC Bluetooth AirPods
Can't wait to listen to 192kHz/24-bit on my macOS desktop with my preexisting 192kHz/24-bit audio pathway!
I work as a developer during the day, but have my home recording setup in the same room, and listen to Apple Music (or other services) all day through that.
I don't think we're in the majority, though.
Re: Apple Music Announces Spatial Audio and Lossless Audio
#390From the article: > J Balvin said: [...] With Lossless, everything in the music is going to sound bigger and stronger but more importantly, it will be better quality. [...] There have been tests showing we cannot hear the difference between minimally lossy audio (e.g. mp3 320kbps) and lossless. But Balvin can. And it sounds "bigger and stronger". The extra quality of lossless is nice when mixing/remixing the sound, a…
Who's to say that Apple now or in the future might not want to do what amounts to dynamic "re-mixing" on-device? Presumably whatever adaptive tricks they might like to pull to make your music sound better or sync up to AR scenes or ... would benefit from the uncompressed source.