Earlier quoted context omitted.
Does this mean you don't support copyright?
Lots of people don't support copyright. It's a concept that should be abolished in it's current form. Right to attribution is OK. Ability to restrict other forms of use is not OK.
Apple enabling client-side CSAM scanning on iPhone tomorrow
371–380 of 757 posts
Re: Apple enabling client-side CSAM scanning on iPhone tomorrow
#372Dear humans, 1) You willingly delegated the decision of what code is allowed to run on your devices to the manufacturer (2009). Smart voices warned you of today's present even then. 2) You willingly got yourself irrevocably vendor-locked by participating in their closed social networks, so that it's almost impossible to leave (2006). 3) You willingly switched over essentially all human communication to said social ne…
The fact that even the 'smart' people from HN can't wait for their new M1 laptop to arrive convinced me that humans are a lost cause.
Re: Apple enabling client-side CSAM scanning on iPhone tomorrow
#373Re: Apple enabling client-side CSAM scanning on iPhone tomorrow
#374Re: Apple enabling client-side CSAM scanning on iPhone tomorrow
#375I'm really conflicted about this. For context, I deeply hate the abuse of children and I've worked on a contract before that landed 12 human traffickers in custody that were smuggling sex slaves across boarders. I didn't need to know details about the victims in question, but it's understood that they're often teenagers or children. So my initial reaction when reading this Twitter thread was "let's get these bastards…
Re: Apple enabling client-side CSAM scanning on iPhone tomorrow
#376I'm really conflicted about this. For context, I deeply hate the abuse of children and I've worked on a contract before that landed 12 human traffickers in custody that were smuggling sex slaves across boarders. I didn't need to know details about the victims in question, but it's understood that they're often teenagers or children. So my initial reaction when reading this Twitter thread was "let's get these bastards…
Re: Apple enabling client-side CSAM scanning on iPhone tomorrow
#377Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's still really, really bad. It always starts with child porn, and in a few years the offline Notes app will be phoning home if you write speech criticising the government in China. This technology inevitably leads to the sueveillance, suppression and murder of activists and journalists. It always starts with protecting the kids or terrorism. Perceptual hashes like what Apple is using are already used in WeChat to…
> in a few years the offline Notes app will be phoning home if you write speech criticising the government in China. A totalitarian autocracy like China does not need this technology to search for wrongspeech, sadly. You are of course aware that all Chinese iCloud users get their data stored in a special set of datacenters that Apple actually doesn't control.
Re: Apple enabling client-side CSAM scanning on iPhone tomorrow
#378Will this work differently depending on what country you are in? For instance, back in 2010 there was that thing about Australia ruling that naked cartoon children count as actual child porn. [1] It's perfectly legal elsewhere (if a bit weird) to have some Simpsons/whatever mash-up of sexualised images, but if I flew on a plane to the land down under, would I then be flagged? edit: If this is scanning stuff on your p…
Re: Apple enabling client-side CSAM scanning on iPhone tomorrow
#379Earlier quoted context omitted.
Either a PinePhone or a Librem 5. There's not much more choice than that atm.
Some people argue Google Pixel (and Chromebooks) can be fully controlled with a custom key.
Re: Apple enabling client-side CSAM scanning on iPhone tomorrow
#380This might be unpopular opinion but catching people sharing CP images is like catching end users of drugs. Yes it's illegal but the real criminals are the ones producing drugs. But it's very difficult to get to them, so you just arrest end users. Another side note is about near future when someone comes up with synthetic CP images, will they also be criminalised?