Live data from Hacker News

Dear Spotify, can we just get a table of songs?

neil.computer

361–370 of 504 posts

Re: Dear Spotify, can we just get a table of songs?

#361
post #351

So we just forgot Joe Rogan and continued with Spotify as if nothing happened? Cool, cool.

I mean, yeah?

Are you new to internet drama? People use it to feel high and mighty for a couple weeks and get some sweet, sweet dopamine hits, and then they go back to doing exactly what they were doing before.

Re: Dear Spotify, can we just get a table of songs?

#362
UI and UX got optimized to hell like other streaming services chasing metrics at all cost.

Sometimes I think there are companies and apps that would benefit from firing their entire UX/UI teams wholesale and then slowly rehiring a portion of them as actual problems crop up from their absence. A reset to this A/B madness of sorts.

Re: Dear Spotify, can we just get a table of songs?

#363

This is a big frustration of mine, too. The other is that Spotify is extremely biased towards playlist listening and makes browsing and listening to a library of albums really painful. The good news is that Spotify's SDK and API are actually powerful enough that you can build up an entire alternative interface, which is actually what I recently started doing: https://i.imgur.com/ar7VrYy.png . It's still work in progr…

It would be awesome if you could support "album playlists/groups/tags" which are stored on Spotify servers using the first track for each album in a standard playlist.

Re: Dear Spotify, can we just get a table of songs?

#366

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Dystopia is when I have to use electron and a slightly inconvenient UI. HN users must have pretty comfy lives.

well, most are earning hundreds of $1000 a year, so their expectations and concerns must be different

>most are earning hundreds of $1000 a year

Is that really the case? Anecdotally I'm earning 50k in EU.

Re: Dear Spotify, can we just get a table of songs?

#367
post #164

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>Spotify is extremely biased towards playlist listening and makes browsing and listening to a library of albums really painful. Does anyone else get a dystopian vibe from this statement? I feel like the old guy in the SF movie pulling his hair and exclaiming, "But what have we lost?!" We used to have vinyl, tapes, finally CDs, and even the ability to rip our library to a computer, which we could carry with us. It was…

> "But what have we lost?!" make a comment or thread about spotify/pandora/tidal and sit back and wait to see how long it takes for some “audiophile” to come along and to admonish you and tell you a story about their setup and music appreciation “workflow” and how it is better and somehow more correct. we lost nothing. it is all still here. and, apparently, the added bonus of droves of sweaty people telling you you’r…

> we lost nothing. it is all still here.

if you ignore the massive amount of music that hasn't been - or often cannot be - released on streaming services, maybe?

Re: Dear Spotify, can we just get a table of songs?

#370

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Enjoyment of music linked to a specific physical item seems incredibly shallow to me. If the music is worth listening to, the medium shouldn't matter at all.

I suppose then you're a proponent of photographing all famous works of art and displaying them on a webpage somewhere, because if the painting is worth looking at, the medium shouldn't matter at all, right? I guess going to a museum to view artwork is an incredibly shallow experience for you?

I'm not that person, but... yes, unironically.

Maybe different people value different things?

Post reply on HN