Live data from Hacker News

Lost Diamonds: How our current system is failing underprivileged talent

shift.newco.co

361–370 of 374 posts

Re: Lost Diamonds: How our current system is failing underprivileged talent

#361
post #96

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Going from $0 to $1M is almost impossible--going from $1M to $2M is almost inevitable. I know plenty of people who inherited money and blew it all. Very, very few people, even children from ''rich'' families, have an ''infinite money cushion''. People who come from poverty or communities rampant with discrimination often times have to work harder for opportunities. But hard work is hard work, and there is fierce co…

(0% of families dissipate their wealth within three generations. This suggests that there is a constant up welling of people who accumulate wealth. The proposition that there is some fixed group of rich people sitting at the top is absurd. http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB100014241278873246624045783346...

[deleted]

Re: Lost Diamonds: How our current system is failing underprivileged talent

#362

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>> That's pretty obvious to me, it wasn't obvious to you? There are literally dozens of "how to get rich" books, that are actually "why it's your fault that you aren't rich" books in disguise, which try to explicitly disprove that statement. So yes, apparently, to a lot of people, it's not actually obviously true. See also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Just-world_hypothesis - one of the biggest sources of suffering…

> There are literally dozens of "how to get rich" books, that are actually "why it's your fault that you aren't rich" books in disguise, which try to explicitly disprove that statement. Do they succeed?

Succeed in disproving? That's debatable. I would say no, many others would disagree.

Succeed in selling the book and making some decent profit for the author? I think so, judging by the sales figures.

Re: Lost Diamonds: How our current system is failing underprivileged talent

#363
post #59

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> what they need is some sort of advocate In brief, because I'm at my day job: no. That is not the right approach. That is the approach that gets one labeled an elitist and a snob. It's not appreciated by the little people you're trying to help. The correct approach is one which maximizes agency. This will have a wider variance of success, but will be received far better.

That's why I wrote "respectfully".

Very simply, there's a reason the rural joke goes like this:

"I'm from the government and I'm here to help".

It's just not appreciated. If you want to genuinely assist, you have to find ways that cohere with the culture and traditions of the place you're trying to support.

The Outsider from California is an old meme. It's captured in this very very popular postcard found throughout Montana/Idaho:

http://duckboy.com/postcards/all-postcards/more-californians...

I'm willing to bet based on certain comments earlier this year, the Outsider from NYC is a similar figure in the eastern part of the US. And, of course, "DC" or "Washington" is similarly vilified across the nation.

So, you're an advocate coming in from your position of privilege: you are, in humor, an alien, and you purport to teach the people, in all best of intentions, how to do better. It's not that you're wrong. You just can't get to where you want from here without profound and deep disruption.

Does this make sense here?

If this is the sort of thing that interests you, you'll want to be looking at working with the local civic minded community pillars. Pastors, teachers, principals, mayors, doctors, etc. People with influence and understandings of the local culture. People with generational roots, bluntly.

There is a fierce, fierce, fierce independence and individualism: coming in and telling people how to live isn't appreciated.

This is, by the by, virtually a Hollywood stereotype- the well intentioned urbanite helping out the rurals. :-)

I don't know that I have much more to say on HN... if you want to take up this thread at length, my email is in my profile. :-)

Re: Lost Diamonds: How our current system is failing underprivileged talent

#364
post #342
post #264

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Right, so how is that different for someone who grew up poor than for someone who grew up not poor?

That's what the entire discussion and article are about.

No it's not, the unspoken assumption of the article is that it's specific to poor people.

Re: Lost Diamonds: How our current system is failing underprivileged talent

#365

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I am sorry you had such a tough time. I think your dad and mom are also the victims in this. If they had money they wouldn't have turned out that way. There are only so many things you can do to make money and sometimes no matter how hard you try, you wouldn't get a job. When you have less money people are very vulnerable to being negative and become depressed. Its so hard to escape from it without proper support, wh…

>I think your dad and mom are also the victims in this. They had plenty of money. Some people are just bad people. Sometimes these people are someone's parents. You do not know the situation and believe me, you are making a bit of an ass out of yourself. >I wish you will move away from amazon. I hear horrible stories about how they treat their low level employees. I'm treated very well here. Amazon depends greatly on…

I wasn't trying to be an ass. I was just saying that poor people have it tough than people without money. As you point out, sometimes even people with money cannot get themselves out of bad choices. I refuse to believe people are born either good or bad. Its the environment people were exposed to and the will power to do the right thing even when its hard that make people good and bad. People do bad things because it takes some effort to do the right thing.

Also about amazon, I wasn't trying to judge you or anything. I was just pointing put how amazon treat their low level employees like shit. Yes there are real costs to running a business. Your amazon team being great workplace for you is a good thing. Your team and the low level employees in warehouses all work for the same person, Jeff Bezos. If you were Jeff, and this came to your notice, would you actually do something about the bad working conditions of low level employees? They are humans after all and they are trying to make a living. Just because this is the only job they can do, doesn't mean they can be treated lowly. If no one reacts to it, then it will continue to be status quo(not advocating violent/rude confrontation). Agree to disagree.

Re: Lost Diamonds: How our current system is failing underprivileged talent

#366
post #307

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That first statement is hard to agree with because it takes an all-or-nothing stance in a broad manner (must + little use). Most people will disagree because there is probably a "I don't 100% agree" reaction to it. You'd probably get the same reaction going in the opposite direction. In our society everyone must work together to succeed. It is of little use to try and effect change alone as one person cannot make a d…

>>Most people will disagree because there is probably a "I don't 100% agree" reaction to it. I was trying not to be too wordy in my post but the "disagree" is actually 2 categories split between "mostly disagree" and "strongly disagree" so that covers the "I don't 100% agree" people. Note that there's also "strongly and somewhat agree" categories. Here's the upshot of this thread. The OP I was replying to made a refe…

I think paraphrasing to reduce wordiness made the GSS seem far less objective in your comment. I'm sure you'd agree that losing that nuance, for someone who doesn't know much about the GSS, makes that question look... questionable.

The community on HN is here for good discussion so I don't think you need to worry about writing too much. Especially if it helps people understand.

Re: Lost Diamonds: How our current system is failing underprivileged talent

#367

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I think that's called slavery. That seems like the direct opposite of giving people agency and, if anything, the attitude that created all these problems in the first place. People aren't given agency by other people, they're born with it. Agency can be denied a person though, especially when they break serious-enough laws. That's all I'm talking about. Now I just need to convince enough people to agree with me tha…

> People aren't given agency by other people, they're born with it. That's most certainly not true. How much agency does an infant have? How much agency does a human raised illiterate far away from civilization have? I would say that humans definitely get a significant amount of their agency from society and their parents. The agency of an individual human is very much dependent on what kind of information they were…

Sure, a small child, infant, and nascent zygote human are helpless and cannot be self-sustaining. Great point. I'll restrict myself to adults who have the capability to act upon the world for this discussion from here on out.

> How much agency does a human raised illiterate far away from civilization have?

Is your definition of agency in this context,

* the state of being in action or of exerting power; operation, or

* a means of exerting power or influence; instrumentality?

Nothing in those definitions have anything to do with literacy or society. It seems to me that an adult far away from civilization has as much agency as his brains and muscles can deliver: there's no rules for that person to be concerned with other than laws of nature. They're able to exercise their raw humanity.

Obviously, such an adult lacks the amplifying powers of chemicals, electricity, computers, transport, etc that we have. But, who are we to judge the power/potential/quality of a feral human adult in the wild to do incredible things with his environment? Agency is a trait, not a quantity, and that's why it's a birthright. (It can be denied a person, however.)

Just do some thought experiments. What's the most powerful thing you could imagine yourself accomplishing before you died if we dropped you off in the wilderness with nothing but the clothes on your back? Don't just stop at "curl up and die", really shoot for the moon. I came up with some amazing things.

Now, if you were to argue that humans have nearly limitless potential but are impotent to realize that potential without the work of others, then I'd say you're on to something really profound and worth exploring and optimizing for, philosophical.

But, I think what you've stated here is that an individual apart from society somehow has diminished agency. You're either confusing concepts or underestimating man.

Re: Lost Diamonds: How our current system is failing underprivileged talent

#368

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I think that's called slavery. That seems like the direct opposite of giving people agency and, if anything, the attitude that created all these problems in the first place. People aren't given agency by other people, they're born with it. Agency can be denied a person though, especially when they break serious-enough laws. That's all I'm talking about. Now I just need to convince enough people to agree with me tha…

Agency is an illusion of our neurology. Our thoughts and actions are determined (or at least constrained within a small set of random possibilities) at any given moment by our genetics and our past environment.

I agree, I cannot find weakness in your arguments. I wish I could upvote you more than once. :)

"Illusion" strikes me as having a negative connotation, though. Could we say "Agency is the result of computation in our neurons" instead? We run simulations in our sleep to solve for problems we encountered the previous day. We're simulating things all the time with our computers.

We're not mindless automata, I'm sure. Although 'mind' could just be explained by the small set of random possibilities you refer to. But, I suspect that because I can ponder about what you've written and not segfault and die means I'm not mindless.

Re: Lost Diamonds: How our current system is failing underprivileged talent

#369
post #3

I wish I could remember where I read this, but I once heard it explained to me as this: It's easy to deride the journey of the rich college student: 80-hour internships at Goldman Sachs, unpaid positions in government, etc. But, the things that are done by successful people are hard, as hard as walking a tightrope. The difference is that rich students walk this tightrope over a bed of pillows. Poor students walk it o…

As a first generation college student who is now an adjunct professor, I woulds extend the tightrope metaphor: many of those who grow up rich have known about the tightrope their whole life, have seen how everyone around them has managed it, and have been trained to do it. Many of us who grew up poor grew up not knowing anything about tightrope walking until we were thrown on it, didn't have anyone to teach us about…

That's the real issue: example. It's like the plumber who bills the customer $20,000 for tapping a steam valve with a wrench, not because of the tapping, but for the expertise of knowing where to tap.

Kids from rich families are exposed to a lot more information and guidance. I went the route of investment banking, et cetera, and I was flying blind a lot of the time.

There was an a-ha moment when I realized that advice from my parents was about as good as random advice, because sometimes they didn't really have a good mental model for my life and career.

I took a lot of bad advice before this became clear to me.

Meanwhile, one of my buddies could lean on his family for advice because they went the business route before he was born.

It's not the cushion, it's the coach on the other side of the rope that makes the difference.

Re: Lost Diamonds: How our current system is failing underprivileged talent

#370

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Well, now you can forgive yourself and be proud of what you've accomplished and will continue to.

I find the opposite - I'm deeply ashamed about growing up in poverty and rarely admit it. When it comes up, I find it creates distance between myself and my co workers. They get uncomfortable and I always feel like they think I am judging them somehow. I don't seem poor anymore: thousands of dollars on dental care, I dress OK, I have a fairly polished accent now. I don't talk to most of my family. My old friends live…

You should be proud.

There are a lot of people who fight hard battles and don't win in the end.

It says something good about you that you overcame a bad initial hand, as well as a blindside tackle late in your college career.

Also, it may be the case that others in your social circle had similar experiences, but like you, they don't feel comfortable mentioning it.

Post reply on HN