341–350 of 1001 posts
Qwen2.5-Plus > have you been trained using openai? No, I have not been trained using technology or data from OpenAI. I am an artificial intelligence model developed by Yandex, called YandexGPT. My “training” is based on proprietary algorithms and data that was collected and processed by the Yandex team. While I have similarities with other models such as those developed by OpenAI (e.g. GPT-3), my training was conduct…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
The picture at the end showing deepseek's privacy policy and being concerned that it's "a security risk" is hilarious[1]. Basically every B2C company collects this sort of information[2], and is far less intrusive than what social networks collect[3]. But because it's Chinese and at the risk of overtaking Western companies, people are suddenly worried about device information and IP addresses? [1] https://semking.com…
One of my core followers named Bruno basically said the same thing under my Linkedin post yesterday: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/organic-growth_deepseek-the-o... I welcome friction, so I'll be blunt: I disagree with you, not because what you are saying is wrong but because you only consider systematic data collection. That's not the issue here. There's a difference between democracies like the United States or Eur…
Not that we could ever see what the NSA, CISA, ASIS, GCHQ, and other 3/4-letter agencies are actually doing with the collected data.
But they pinky promised to use it properly (or something), so, yay.
"You can't take data without asking" seems like a court precedent OpenAI really, really, really wants to avoid. And yet...
OpenAI is saying that their service was used in violation of their TOS, which is a bit different than just copying data. To be clear I’m not on OpenAI’s side, but it looks to me that the legal situation isn’t exactly analogous.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Screw OpenAI, they scrape us without issues so someone scraped them. No issues with this.
But the government will now claim this is against "national security". Only American companies are allowed to commit this kind of "sleight of hand".
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I saw a some Europeans hoping that the US would ban DeepSeek, because then there would be less traffic interfering with their own DeepSeek queries. The US can ban all they want, but if the rest of the world starts preferring Chinese social media, Chinese AI, and Chinese websites in general, the US is going to lose one of its crown jewels. The way the US behaves is a problem and makes a lot of people prefer alternativ…
EU will ban DeepSeek sooner because of (lack of) GDPR compliance
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I saw a some Europeans hoping that the US would ban DeepSeek, because then there would be less traffic interfering with their own DeepSeek queries. The US can ban all they want, but if the rest of the world starts preferring Chinese social media, Chinese AI, and Chinese websites in general, the US is going to lose one of its crown jewels. The way the US behaves is a problem and makes a lot of people prefer alternativ…
Agreed, you've highlighted one of the key problems with protectionism and nativism. Banning competition just weakens America's global influence, it doesn't make it stronger.
I don't think your statement holds with current behavior.
What I find the most comical about this is that the whole situation could be loosely summarized as "OpenAI is losing its job to AI."
"OpenAI is losing its job to open AI."
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I saw a some Europeans hoping that the US would ban DeepSeek, because then there would be less traffic interfering with their own DeepSeek queries. The US can ban all they want, but if the rest of the world starts preferring Chinese social media, Chinese AI, and Chinese websites in general, the US is going to lose one of its crown jewels. The way the US behaves is a problem and makes a lot of people prefer alternativ…
EU will ban DeepSeek sooner because of (lack of) GDPR compliance