“ Is Bloom's "Two Sigma" phenomenon real? If so, what do we do about it? Educational psychologist Benjamin Bloom found that one-on-one tutoring using mastery learning led to a two sigma(!) improvement in student performance. The results were replicated. " Does anyone know if this also true of learning & development in companies? For example sales training or training
Patrick Collison's Questions
31–40 of 288 posts
Re: Patrick Collison's Questions
#32Different risk postures. If you're willing to sacrifice a few lives and limbs and not worry about the disposition of toxic waste, you can get things done just as fast today as yesterday.
Re: Patrick Collison's Questions
#33“ Is Bloom's "Two Sigma" phenomenon real? If so, what do we do about it? Educational psychologist Benjamin Bloom found that one-on-one tutoring using mastery learning led to a two sigma(!) improvement in student performance. The results were replicated. " Does anyone know if this also true of learning & development in companies? For example sales training or training
Out of everything on the page, this grabbed my attention too. This seems to have immediate implications for how even experienced professionals train. I'd like to become much better at math than I am now. Should I be putting a lot of effort into working out a one-on-one tutoring partnership?
Re: Patrick Collison's Questions
#34“ Is Bloom's "Two Sigma" phenomenon real? If so, what do we do about it? Educational psychologist Benjamin Bloom found that one-on-one tutoring using mastery learning led to a two sigma(!) improvement in student performance. The results were replicated. " Does anyone know if this also true of learning & development in companies? For example sales training or training
Out of everything on the page, this grabbed my attention too. This seems to have immediate implications for how even experienced professionals train. I'd like to become much better at math than I am now. Should I be putting a lot of effort into working out a one-on-one tutoring partnership?
Re: Patrick Collison's Questions
#35Earlier quoted context omitted.
huh? there’s plenty of colleges to choose from and yet costs go up every year. to me it seems like a distortion caused by a Federal Gov that guarantees payment to universities in the form of federally backed student loans.
Subsidized corn is not rapidly and consistently increasing in price.
and it’s much more of an inelastic good than corn
the difference between 50k in tuition and expenses and 55k will not change demand a meaningful amount, and universities exploit the fact that education is inelastic and the money is coming from a guaranteed source regardless of the student’s ability to pay upfront.
Re: Patrick Collison's Questions
#36On the Chinese research question: Just wait a decade. In all likelihood, I am permanently departing academia in about a month. The underlying reason is structural -- neither our funding agency nor our institution is willing to yield on a fundamental sticking point that is causing all of our young researchers to leave. I am about to join them. There is literally no path forward. In the decade that I have watched my wo…
Re: Patrick Collison's Questions
#37Re: Patrick Collison's Questions
#38Earlier quoted context omitted.
Subsidized corn is not rapidly and consistently increasing in price.
I don’t necessarily buy the idea that student loans are driving price increases, but there’s a tangible difference between subsidizing producers versus consumers (corn subsidies are generally the former, student loans are the latter).
Re: Patrick Collison's Questions
#39It is interesting that the real cost of medical care and hospital services didn't see any sort of inflection change with the introduction of the ACA. One the key reasons for implementing the ACA -- which I supported, mind you -- was to control rising healthcare costs. Costs might still rise, but the rate of rise should be lower than before. This graph doesn't seem to show that. What am I missing?
No one expected it would.
> One the key reasons for implementing the ACA -- which I supported, mind you -- was to control rising healthcare costs.
The immediate reason was to address broad consumer affordability, especially for the people that could least afford it and needed it most.
Long-term, overall cost containment was a long-term goal, but it wasn't expected to have that effect in the short-term, and the pieces that contribute to that either weren't implemented at all, weren't implemented fully, or weren't maintained. (And, heck, a lot of the other pieces weren't in place long before they too started being chipped away at.)
For example, the pieces building on the HIPAA Administrative Simplification provisions designed to by increasing the coverage of transaction standards and doing regular modernization so that incompatible ad hoc approaches wouldn't be needed as extensively were largely unimplemented, with the most important mandated standard operating rules never adopted and the mandated regular (3-year, IIRC) update cycle for the standards and standard operating rules never begun. There are mandated dates in law, but HHS never adopted the required regulations. (That's actually one of the more minor unimplemented cost containment measures, but the one I'm most intimately familiar with because I spent a lot of time those rules were in limbo being involved in planning compliance catch-up and forward looking planning for a component of a state Medicaid system.)
Re: Patrick Collison's Questions
#40"Why are so many things so much nicer in Switzerland and Japan?" Figuring out why this is without fully attributing it to culture has been of great fascination to me. It really is mindblowing just how _good_ things are in Japan, perhaps they're just highly optimized for tourism? The cleanliness, the service, the great care people place in doing things and in their work is just amazing. Anyone here have more insights…
...have you considered that things are much nicer there but at great cost to the sections of people they consider "not nice?" Especially in Japan?