Earlier quoted context omitted.
Which indicates the author knows nothing about how semiconductor fabs use power. Power usage is stable with a few percent...and 100MW is really on the low side for this fab. If all 6 phases are completed as they are expected to be...it's more like 250MW.
I think we can forgive the author for the low estimate considering that this project didn't exist publicly at the time of writing. How does power usage remain stable in a fab? Please say more about how that works.
TSMC ups Arizona investment from $12B to $40B with second semi fab
291–294 of 294 posts
Re: TSMC ups Arizona investment from $12B to $40B with second semi fab
#292Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Large semiconductor fabs use as much as 100 megawatt-hours of power each hour Ooof, this kind of writing where the author doesn't understand units just gets my goat. Just say it uses 100 MW! Geez.
I prefer it as written, because the additional information of timeframe for measurement indicates that the author is not talking about momentary/peak power.
Re: TSMC ups Arizona investment from $12B to $40B with second semi fab
#293Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't think you appreciate just how much water the northern part of the continent has.
Actually, I do. I've lived there. Generally speaking, substantial alterations to hydrological regimes can cause deleterious cascading ecological effects. Just look toward the literature on the hydrological (and consequential ecological) effects of dams (necessary to divert water) for examples. One of particular interest is dams' tendency to reduce the frequency and severity of flooding events, which are characteristi…