Live data from Hacker News

Hey Nico, you didn't vibe code your data room but stole it from Papermark

twitter.com

261–270 of 323 posts

Re: Hey Nico, you didn't vibe code your data room but stole it from Papermark

#261

One other Twitter comments reveals that they probably just asked an AI to copy Papermark. Evidenced by AI comments saying the page was aligned to the "reference" https://xcancel.com/ffumarola/status/2070479755892371713#m

The era of chinese level competition is here.

If it were, they would make it worse then in time make it better, not just copy verbatim

Re: Hey Nico, you didn't vibe code your data room but stole it from Papermark

#262
post #131

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We should thank companies for warning us during the interview process that they are so separated from reality (especially in the AI era) If AI can’t make them recognize a work life balance has value then it’s easy to see they don’t believe the “force multiplier” BS they are peddling

They are worth 3 billion after two years so it seems like they are doing all right with their strategy although I'm old now and don't want to do that

Is that how things work now? Well then, I m worth five billion nd say things should stop working that way. Persuaded?

Re: Hey Nico, you didn't vibe code your data room but stole it from Papermark

#263
post #91

Their response: > The team that made dataroom has stated that they did not use any of papermark’s code and that dataroom was made from scratch with inspiration from existing document sharing softwares, and that this post’s allegations of us stealing code are false. [...] The screenshots clearly show they copied whole pages verbatim, both design and texts. The founder, Nico Laqua, basically responding with "we didn't…

We’ve normalized stealing code en masse so this will pass as perfectly fine behavior - what LLMs put out is a spectrum of infringement, this is just in the more obvious end.

Re: Hey Nico, you didn't vibe code your data room but stole it from Papermark

#265

One other Twitter comments reveals that they probably just asked an AI to copy Papermark. Evidenced by AI comments saying the page was aligned to the "reference" https://xcancel.com/ffumarola/status/2070479755892371713#m

Unreal. I had to go back to the original Tweet to confirm that screenshot wasn’t faked. The comment clearly says “Mirror’s the reference design’s” I don’t know how they could try to spin that as anything other than having an LLM launder someone’s code as a “reference design” Even if they try to argue that the “reference design” was Figma, the identical copy means they had to have copied Papermark into the reference d…

Problem is law hasn't caught up with how easy this previously GOOJF practice became with LLMs:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clean-room_design

Re: Hey Nico, you didn't vibe code your data room but stole it from Papermark

#266

I hope YC does the right thing here and pull funding of these ass wipes.

This is exactly the kind of legal gray area move that YC companies like to take advantage of. It's not technically illegal for Reddit to fake users, for Airbnb to piggyback off Craigslist, for OpenAI to be a non-profit with a for-profit subsidiary, for PearAI to fork a competitor and relabel it as their own, for Flock to accidentally misidentify criminals, for Delve to fake SOCS compliance, or for Corgi to steal a competitor's product by having an LLM reproduce it instead of copying the code directly. If anything, YC will just help them with their legal defense.

Re: Hey Nico, you didn't vibe code your data room but stole it from Papermark

#267

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> It would be a clear cut rule, and extreme "shape rotator" types... It had to look that slang up: https://roonscape.ai/p/a-song-of-shapes-and-words . > ...often have trouble with the fuzziness of things like law. In reality, copyright infringement is often more like the porn test, you know it when you see it. I'd say it's more like the fuzziness defeats most of the software-style "exploits" those types gravitate tow…

A very clear example of this is the 'Sovereign Citizen', who have bizarre beliefs around how to interact with courts. As far as I understand it, there are some 'cheat codes' people believe (incorrectly) are effective in literally getting you out of jail free. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereign_citizen_movement > Another common belief among sovereign citizens is that they can opt out of the purported contract, ma…

> why would law enforcement and courts go along with it?

They don't want to deal with it. If someone has one of those SovCit license plates, you know pulling them over is guaranteed to result in frustrating verbal sparring match, which may result in the cop giving up (which is then shared as evidence for the SovCit movement's effectiveness!), or may escalate to a physical altercation.

Whether or not the SovCit practitioners understand that's what's happening is anyone's guess.

Re: Hey Nico, you didn't vibe code your data room but stole it from Papermark

#268
post #95

The X link has screenshots where the two products have lots of identical pages. Is that IPable? Honestly don't know since I seem to use a lot of products that look like other products (LibreOffice, etc). But the pages for obscure things looking identical is kind of sus.

IP and Copyright are two different concepts. Protected IP tends to break into trade secrets (protected by secrecy) and patents (protected by disclosure).

Similarly, trade dress and trademarks are related but different, and in USA most Trademarks™ are not Registered® (although to get ® you generally use ™ along the way), and most trade dress is not either.

See also:

- clean room design: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clean-room_design

- trade dress: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trade_dress

Amusingly, the packaging of a dress is trade dress, but the dress design itself isn't protected.

Re: Hey Nico, you didn't vibe code your data room but stole it from Papermark

#269
> Sorry for the delayed response to this, I just woke up

Posted 7:52 am

https://x.com/i/status/2070158170937581951

Ahhh, that explains now why working 7 days a week is necessary for this Manhattan-project-level startup, he's not ‘Grindmaxxing’ by waking up with the 5 AM club every day!

(Context for folks not terminally online: https://x.com/i/status/2061139112426623054)

Re: Hey Nico, you didn't vibe code your data room but stole it from Papermark

#270

Can someone give a bit more of context on this thread? I have no idea who Nico is nor what Papermark is or does. As an aside thought not related to the thread: Is it my perception or people are getting more used to not only vibe code things from existing solutions/projects but also "steal" open source code and do whatever the heck they want without complying morally/ethically/legally to the whole premise of open sour…

The shared fiction of "intellectual property" is crumbling. People who grew up with normalized piracy at the consumer level and industrialized exploitation of artists' works at the corporate level don't see the value of it.

Add to that the fact that anyone can simply do what they want with the bits on their computer, and sharing anything over the internet means giving them a copy of those bits, the technical barriers are gone too.

This isn't a value judgement just an observation.

Post reply on HN