Mini’s statement only highlights the absurdity (emphasis mine): >With regard to the turn indicator light pattern, there should be no trouble at all for a driver to understand, when seeing the full rear of the car , which direction is being indicated So what about when you can only see half of the car? Like when it’s changing lanes or pulling out of a parking spot? You know, like those times when a signal is MOST usef…
This is what I _hate_ about the Audi striping indicators. Yes, they are actually useful when you see them when they are indicating. However, when they have the hazard lights on, they still stripe. So if it's still and you can't see the left indicator, it feels like a very strong statement that they are trying to move out.
Congratulations, Mini, you made the stupidest turn signals ever
251–260 of 448 posts
Re: Congratulations, Mini, you made the stupidest turn signals ever
#252So the left turn signal is an arrow pointing to the right? And the right turn signal is an arrow pointing to the left? How does that pass, well, anything at all without someone saying “that might not be the best idea”!
How could anyone be confused? They’re on the side the car is turning - like every other turn signal you’ve seen in your entire life.
Re: Congratulations, Mini, you made the stupidest turn signals ever
#253To me, this sends another signal. One that says "don't work at Mini". If something like this is able to make it all the way through design, production and testing -- with no one raising a red flag along the way -- what other less visible but equally bone-headed ideas are making it into their cars?
I think the problem lies, as usual, with america. These lamp clusters were designed in a European environment where we have brake lights and turn indicators. By the time the design was nearing production it was probably too late to cancel when they realised that some parts of this planet have the boneheaded idea that flashing the red stop light was a good idea. Mini therefore had three options: 1) Sell the global spe…
If only designing cars is what they did for a living..
Re: Congratulations, Mini, you made the stupidest turn signals ever
#254Mini’s statement only highlights the absurdity (emphasis mine): >With regard to the turn indicator light pattern, there should be no trouble at all for a driver to understand, when seeing the full rear of the car , which direction is being indicated So what about when you can only see half of the car? Like when it’s changing lanes or pulling out of a parking spot? You know, like those times when a signal is MOST usef…
The design is dumb but you’re really stretching. I don’t need to see the entire rear of the car to know which way the blinker is indicating. If I did then that would mean 99% of the cars on the road, which have no arrow at all, would suffer from this ambiguity.
Re: Congratulations, Mini, you made the stupidest turn signals ever
#255It looks like a misguided attempt to remind people of the Union flag.
Edit: Oops, didn't read all the article; that is exactly what they were doing.
Re: Congratulations, Mini, you made the stupidest turn signals ever
#256So the left turn signal is an arrow pointing to the right? And the right turn signal is an arrow pointing to the left? How does that pass, well, anything at all without someone saying “that might not be the best idea”!
They probably designed the car with Europe regulations in mind first, and then rather than try and design an entirely new brake light for the US just took the lazy/cheap way and lit up the other two available light bars.
Re: Congratulations, Mini, you made the stupidest turn signals ever
#257Re: Congratulations, Mini, you made the stupidest turn signals ever
#258Re: Congratulations, Mini, you made the stupidest turn signals ever
#259> there should be no trouble at all for a driver to understand, when seeing the full rear of the car, which direction is being indicated. This response from Mini presumes drivers have the luxury of using "system 2" logical/analytical reasoning in a hectic realtime environment where they must most rely on "system 1" intuitive reasoning. There needs to be a name for this type design fallacy, because it's not the first…
Don't know the name of the fallacy, but there's a book aptly titled "Don't make me think", which talks about exactly this problem (for web design). Thing like turn signals shouldn't make you think - it must be automatically, instantly recognizable in every possible way.