241–250 of 521 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Let's assume it's true: a Paytm employee acted negligently. Not negligently - maliciously. The employee knew exactly what they're doing, that it was "wrong" in any conventional sense -- and most likely a huge liability to their career and reputation if it got found out.
Working in a call center isn't a "career".
Wanted to get Model Y in the past. Nice comfy car, huge backseat and… a camera filming inside the car. Thanks no. Apparently for drowsiness detection, but I am not buying it. Time of flight camera staring at the driver’s face is kinda normal in car industry. Not a normal color camera filming everything and streaming somewhere like Tesla does.
While some of the behaviour here is less professional than I'd expect for user data, I'm wondering what a good architecture for building a system to leverage visual telemetry without harming user privacy would really look like. The problem is that: 1) It's very difficult to manually or automatically scrub identifying information from video, and doing so probably greatly reduces the value of the data for AI training p…
> I'm wondering what a good architecture for building a system to leverage visual telemetry without harming user privacy would really look like For starters, employees should have no way to save images from customers. No way to export them, load them on a USB drive, FTP them, or take a picture with their smartphone. If you need people to do tagging, fine, do it [WITH PERMISSION] on special workstations in restricted…
This is the solution and something that most companies refuse to do. At best there's some kind of opt-out, but companies love hoovering up everything they can get their hands on whether you want them to or not. It's bad enough when it happens in a corporate-owned space like a grocery store, office, or mall, but when it's happening with items you ostensibly own on your own property it feels fucking criminal. I don't understand why consumers and legislators continue to tolerate it.
The car crashing into a kid on a bike I can understand, but why are they reviewing videos innocuous events during random charging sessions?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Tesla motors was incorporated/founded by Martin Eberhard and Marc Tarpenning and not Musk
Eberhard sued Musk challenging his right to call himself a founder and the case resolved such that Musk gets to keep calling himself a founder. Musk was a major source of funding early on, putting in about 6 million out of a 7 million dollar raise, served as chairman of the board, headed product design for the Roadster, and took over as CEO before they launched the Roadster. Tesla publicly acknowledges him as a found…
In some countries, "moral rights" ban the practice of buying and selling the right to change facts like authorship.
Yes, I know soon all autos will have internet and I think most already have bluetooth.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Get a German car. Privacy is taken extremely seriously here in Germany. In all walks of life. Companies, schools, doctor‘s offices, etc. Edit: I wouldn’t want to touch a Tesla even if it was gifted to me. Seeing the founder behave the way he does (latest incident: Changing Twitter’s logo to a shitcoins image) makes him extremely unsympathetic to me.
Point of information: Doge was a meme before the coin. Dogecoin exists because it was created as a meme coin. Given that point, doge is an avatar of stupidity personified (caninified?) and so is a good fit for Twitter.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Get a German car. Privacy is taken extremely seriously here in Germany. In all walks of life. Companies, schools, doctor‘s offices, etc. Edit: I wouldn’t want to touch a Tesla even if it was gifted to me. Seeing the founder behave the way he does (latest incident: Changing Twitter’s logo to a shitcoins image) makes him extremely unsympathetic to me.
Point of information: Doge was a meme before the coin. Dogecoin exists because it was created as a meme coin. Given that point, doge is an avatar of stupidity personified (caninified?) and so is a good fit for Twitter.
While some of the behaviour here is less professional than I'd expect for user data, I'm wondering what a good architecture for building a system to leverage visual telemetry without harming user privacy would really look like. The problem is that: 1) It's very difficult to manually or automatically scrub identifying information from video, and doing so probably greatly reduces the value of the data for AI training p…
Ok. But so what? Doing medical experiments on large, unknowing populations of humans might be hugely valuable for development of medicine, but we don't do it. Claiming there's some potential future benefit to violating someone's autonomy today is weak sauce at best and highly unethical at worst.
It may seem paranoid, but it is sane to expect that everything that it is closed and consequently not auditable for security and privacy, and goes online on a network we have no control over, even though not a public one, will soon or later be used for spying.