Earlier quoted context omitted.
I've posted an AskHN about self-regulation mechanisms on HN just today and instantly got flagged: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23220998 Please upvote another attempt: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23223939
I remember seeing an exchange where a moderator seemed to be able to edit another person's comment well after the edit period with no indication an edit was made. Kind of hope I misunderstood the exchange, but if that's the case that instantly undermines any possible claim to being "ultimate place on the Web to discover and discuss bleeding-edge content" In general HN is not that place anyways. People here confuse me…
Google deletes “communist bandits” from comments on Youtube
221–230 of 1001 posts
Re: Google deletes “communist bandits” from comments on Youtube
#222Similar happens with the name "Eric Ciaramella", which YouTube instantly deletes. This is a name of a CIA whistle blower. It would be interesting to know what other words are in the YouTube censor list.
Wow. No Wikipedia articles on him either, and reports of people getting permanently banned from Wikipedia for trying to create that article, or even mentioning him in another.
Re: Google deletes “communist bandits” from comments on Youtube
#223Earlier quoted context omitted.
We have loads of communication channel alternatives. People freely choose google and should be allowed to continue freely choosing whatever platform they please. The idea that some governing body can better choose my communication platform for my personal needs than I can for myself doesn't seem logical from my point of view.
The argument is a popular Authoritarian viewpoint that isn't viewed as such. Meanwhile the work towards decentralization continues, one day I hope it'll get the network effect akin to Bittorrent.
But in terms of network effect... YouTube has two billion users.
Re: Google deletes “communist bandits” from comments on Youtube
#224https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/12/us/politics/youtube-terro...
Re: Google deletes “communist bandits” from comments on Youtube
#225The reason that hate speech creates outrage is because it exists to communicate inhuman hatred of others for their immutable characteristics.
The reason that sites like YouTube don't tolerate it isn't that they share in the outrage - it's that they rely entirely on advertisers to keep their bottom line positive, and advertisers aren't going to pay to be associated with hate speech.
Hate speech isn't "mostly subjective". It can be easily identified using a few easy qualifiers. Most people who have trouble defining hate speech are people who, at least partially, agree with it.
Re: Google deletes “communist bandits” from comments on Youtube
#226Youtube is in a tough spot. They will be blamed: - if they don't take down speech some consider hateful - if they take down speech some do not consider hateful 共匪 is seen as an insult by a group, but others do not. If Youtube bans nothing, then hate speech thrives and they get bad PR. If Youtube bans anything anyone flags as hate speech, then they become de facto as censorship agents for foreign powers. Anything crit…
Re: Google deletes “communist bandits” from comments on Youtube
#227Earlier quoted context omitted.
> If this is true, follow the money Isn't it more likely it was flagged off the front page by overly-enthusiastic users? I'll also admit that this link, to a support thread, is more compelling than the Ask HN, where half the comments were questioning whether the phenomenon was actually happening.
Is that more likely? Should it be that easy for a user to flag an article that's trending so far upward? If it is that easy, maybe we should discuss the flagging system because it gives the ILLUSION that it was taken down because there's a conflict of interest.
Re: Google deletes “communist bandits” from comments on Youtube
#228Earlier quoted context omitted.
I hope your youtube account isn't linked to a gmail account you consider important.
This is the first time I am seriously considering leaving Gmail. Seems like a royal pain in the ass to switch though, since you don't "own" your email handle like you would a domain.
The only reason I use them is their spam filters are excellent. Otherwise I wouldn't.
Switching would be laborious if you're using @gmail, probably a case of looking at each unique domain name you've received an email from, logging in and switching addresses. Could be relatively methodical about it by taking a backup and then working down your inbox and deleting the emails from those recipients until you have nothing left. Could be a day job.
There is an option in gmail to forward your emails to another address if you wanted to do it over time.
Re: Google deletes “communist bandits” from comments on Youtube
#229Re: Google deletes “communist bandits” from comments on Youtube
#230Youtube is in a tough spot. They will be blamed: - if they don't take down speech some consider hateful - if they take down speech some do not consider hateful 共匪 is seen as an insult by a group, but others do not. If Youtube bans nothing, then hate speech thrives and they get bad PR. If Youtube bans anything anyone flags as hate speech, then they become de facto as censorship agents for foreign powers. Anything crit…
The words “communist bandit” are not “hate speech”. This is ridiculous. How infantilised have we become these days?