Earlier quoted context omitted.
It IS communicated. If you just pull up control center and tap the button is says “Disconnected from ‘WiFiNetwork’”. If you expand the panel with 3D Touch or a long press under the WiFi icon it either says WiFiName or Not Connected. On the other hand the cellular radio says Off if you toggle it. This isn’t completely hidden. The information is there. And I agree with the other posters that this is a far better settin…
> At this point I’m not sure there’s a need for normal users to actually turn off Wi-Fi. Or anyone who doesn’t want to be tracked by random retailers. I worked for one such company, so I know intimately how it works, including how MAC address randomization doesn’t actually work in the real world at completely obscuring your device.
iOS 11's Misleading "Off-Ish" Setting for Radios Is Bad for User Security
191–200 of 342 posts
Re: iOS 11's Misleading "Off-Ish" Setting for Radios Is Bad for User Security
#192Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think there is a valid point that while this is changing what is happening under the hood, the behaviour is effectively identical for the vast majority of users, and arguably improved for most use cases (most non-technical users wouldn't understand that that switch would stop airdrop working, and even as an extremely technical user I have accidentally forgotten to switch my WiFi back on after needing to temporarily…
Honestly I don't think it's effectively identical for the vast majority of users. Every single time I've wanted to turn off Wifi and Bluetooth, it's because I know I'm going to struggle to get my battery to last till I can charge it again. I'm going to be out and on the move, so Wifi has no value to me except as a battery drain. In fact, I struggle to think of any other ordinary use for disabling Wifi and Bluetooth.…
This. We can’t turn off BlueTooth/WiFi from the swipe-up screen anymore. Full stop.
Re: iOS 11's Misleading "Off-Ish" Setting for Radios Is Bad for User Security
#193Earlier quoted context omitted.
This decision seems so fundamentally "anti-Apple". What happened to "it just works"? Heck, they could have even promoted a third option as being super innovative (not like it is, but marketing "Now with 'WiFi Safe Sleep!' or something like that would have been the old Apple way).
> hn_throwaway_99 Is really HN so hostile to statements critical of anything Apple does that you actually need to create a throwaway for it? To me, that seems a bit extreme. Edit: Not so throwaway after all then. Didn't consider checking.
Re: iOS 11's Misleading "Off-Ish" Setting for Radios Is Bad for User Security
#194Earlier quoted context omitted.
Turn off ‘ask to join networks’ - mine been that ways for 10 years and it’s much better.
I hate both. If "ask" is on, it's constantly harassing me. If "ask" is off, I have to search hard to find the setting that lets me connect to a wifi network in a tool that also lets me change the language I'm using.
Re: iOS 11's Misleading "Off-Ish" Setting for Radios Is Bad for User Security
#195Earlier quoted context omitted.
You're missing out. 3D Touch is pretty powerful and provides access to more than "Useless Options" now.
It still bugs me as very undiscoverable. I don’t want to press things I don’t intend to toggle just to see whats underneath them. Maybe I’ll get used to it but right now I’m old man grumpy.
Re: iOS 11's Misleading "Off-Ish" Setting for Radios Is Bad for User Security
#196Earlier quoted context omitted.
There is no way to 3D touch the bluetooth and wireless radios all the way off in iOS11. You have to manually go all the way into settings.app now which takes quite a bit more effort not to mention longer than the old control center
You can 3D Touch the settings app which provides shortcuts to both bluetooth settings and wifi settings.
Re: iOS 11's Misleading "Off-Ish" Setting for Radios Is Bad for User Security
#197All they had to do was implement it to cycle between three states: on, off-temporarily, and actually off. Or label the damned things. But no, they fundamentally changed how an important UI widget worked with no obvious indication that anything is different.
Re: iOS 11's Misleading "Off-Ish" Setting for Radios Is Bad for User Security
#198> In an attempt to keep you connected to Apple devices and services, iOS 11 compromises users' security. No. It is in an attempt to resolve the real loss of money experienced by everyday users who turn off WiFi when it’s flakey and then forget to turn it back on, costing them cash on their cellular data plan. (And the very real frustration when things don’t work they expect to work, and they don’t know why.) Meanwhil…
Are the "security motivated" also expected to know if iMessage or FaceTime stopped using end-to-end encryption, too?
These things should be communicated. Also, all Apple had to do was make it a 3-toggle button instead of a 2-toggle one. Just keep the normal way of turning-off Wi-Fi and add a new one for Disconnect Wi-Fi, too. Nothing could be simpler. But no, Apple has to be "courageous" in pissing off a large portion of their users each time they do something, rather than implementing a UX change as simple as that without disturbing well learned UX behaviors for their users.
Re: iOS 11's Misleading "Off-Ish" Setting for Radios Is Bad for User Security
#199Earlier quoted context omitted.
> No. It is in an attempt to resolve the real loss of money... Naked apologism. So unthoughtful, and delivered with such a righteous tone. If this was their intention, they could have implemented the feature honestly, informing users about what was happening, and offering a clear choice, such as an immediate popup, between "turn off for this location" and "turn off completely." That would have been fine. But the exis…
> Naked apologism. So unthoughtful, and delivered with such a righteous tone. And, of course, voted up to the very top of the comments section here, as usual. The Apple apologists here are a bit of a plague.
Re: iOS 11's Misleading "Off-Ish" Setting for Radios Is Bad for User Security
#200Earlier quoted context omitted.
> At this point I’m not sure there’s a need for normal users to actually turn off Wi-Fi. Or anyone who doesn’t want to be tracked by random retailers. I worked for one such company, so I know intimately how it works, including how MAC address randomization doesn’t actually work in the real world at completely obscuring your device.
Would you mind sharing the details of how MAC address randomization is being defeated in the real world?