Live data from Hacker News

France threatens GrapheneOS with arrests / server seizure for refusing backdoors

mamot.fr

181–190 of 399 posts

Re: France threatens GrapheneOS with arrests / server seizure for refusing backdoors

#181

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> scared them pas-de-merde Huh?

French for "shitless"

I think it may be a tongue in cheek semi-literal translation from English, I’ve not come across this as idiomatic French before.

Re: France threatens GrapheneOS with arrests / server seizure for refusing backdoors

#182
post #90

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Of course they will respond to warrants, they have to, and nowadays they have the infrastructure to forward all traffic to law emforcement's servers in real-time.

> and nowadays they have the infrastructure to forward all traffic to law enforcement's servers in real-time. The goal should be, designing your infrastructure in such a way they simply cannot forward this traffic to law enforcement.

Phone operators are heavily regulated and licensed, and this is a legal requirement and a requirement of their licence. Complying with lawful warrants is also obviously a legal obligatuon.

Re: France threatens GrapheneOS with arrests / server seizure for refusing backdoors

#183
Everything about the exercise of power in the digital world is tilted away from the individual.

Windows 11 moved all my files into the cloud without even asking me! I was livid--those are documents that I deliberately DID NOT WANT in the cloud! It's crazy what malice we have to put up with and navigate these days. It just keeps getting worse and more convoluted, too.

Re: France threatens GrapheneOS with arrests / server seizure for refusing backdoors

#184
post #71

I think your devices should have government-mandated backdoors if and only if you are a public servant. I don't understand why private citizens are held to higher standards of conduct than politicians and cops.

The only problem with that train of thought is that you are advocating a lower standard. Backdoors are not a superior option in any circumstance whatsoever.

The standard of conduct we need (and are failing) to hold politicians and cops to is actual security and responsibility. Some of the most powerful politicians in the world are leaking private conversations, and no one is holding them accountable. Police are paying private corporations (notably Flock) to build giant monolithic datasets from stalking private citizens, yet neither party is held to any standard whatsoever.

Re: France threatens GrapheneOS with arrests / server seizure for refusing backdoors

#185
post #71

I think your devices should have government-mandated backdoors if and only if you are a public servant. I don't understand why private citizens are held to higher standards of conduct than politicians and cops.

We do have things like the Freedom of Information Act in the US, and I think a lot of European countries have similar laws. Yes it isn’t perfect and could be enforced more evenly.

But obviously, if you work for the military there is information that needs to be kept secure…

Re: France threatens GrapheneOS with arrests / server seizure for refusing backdoors

#186
post #168

The article is kind of interesting: on the one hand, you’ve got a tool that can be used by ordinary citizens and political dissidents for legitimate reasons. On the other, the French police were mildly inconvenienced during their arrest of a small-time drug dealer. Yes, really, that’s the argument.

It's about protecting kids/olds/fighting crime/drug dealer

`What would you like me to wrap the global surveillance in?'

Re: France threatens GrapheneOS with arrests / server seizure for refusing backdoors

#187
post #130

Remember when they arrested Pavel Durov? I don't buy their official reasoning. Dear European friends, our leaders are tightening the screws. If we don't make our voices heard this is only going to get worse. https://x.com/durov/status/1976420399970701543

You know I didn't use to understand libertarians, but after years of watching boundaries being overstepped again and again I think I see the appeal of burning it all down and living in a cabin in the woods. Like, in Europe we already live in a completely safe society in historical and geographic terms, what more do you fucking want? Security is beyond a laughable excuse for things like chat control. Power tripping el…

The same reason there's only more regulations being piled on top of previous ones. Sadly only wars and similar catastrophes work as reset buttons for these things historically. A peace as long as the current one is somewhat of an untested ground

Re: France threatens GrapheneOS with arrests / server seizure for refusing backdoors

#188

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've been saying this for years: the more power you have the higher standard you should be held in. In most societies on the planet it's the other way around.

Everyone agrees with this obviously but it's like saying that we should be able to levitate or live in utopia. It's almost a law of nature that the types that become powerful are not your most savory individuals and will use the power to reinforce their positions.

This is obviously true, but people will downvote it because they don't like it.

Re: France threatens GrapheneOS with arrests / server seizure for refusing backdoors

#189
post #141

The gloves are really off against the best interests of the public now aren't they?

In a sense, trajectory has not really changed, but, admittedly, the pace of change has accellerated tremendously. UK and now France.

Re: France threatens GrapheneOS with arrests / server seizure for refusing backdoors

#190
post #71

I think your devices should have government-mandated backdoors if and only if you are a public servant. I don't understand why private citizens are held to higher standards of conduct than politicians and cops.

Backdoors exist for everyone or they exist for no one, this technology isn't one that has room for a gray area to debate. If it can be deployed to public servant devices, it can be deployed to your device.

That is totally not true. They can be forced to install an app on their device that creates the backdoors. Companies do that all the time. An OS doesn't need to have backdoors built into it for backdoors to be added to it. Kinda the point of an OS is that it is general purpose.
Post reply on HN