Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't see why the HN community has to honor/uphold/tolerate/defend the opinion of a throwaway account posting inaccurate information its own cited source refutes. These alternative viewpoints need to have some level of credibility to them, we should not defend every rando's opinion blindly. I don't think an "open society" has ever actually existed or is even possible. All freedoms are measured in degrees based on t…
> I don't see why the HN community has to honor/uphold/tolerate/defend Those are all very different words. And you do the same below when you mix up "tolerate" and "legitimize". Are you trying to confuse the debate? To be clear, I'm solely arguing for tolerate and not censor , not any of the other things. And wow, looking at that comment that was flagged, I can't comprehend how you would believe it's so repugnant tha…
Not really. You are arguing that misinformation needs to have a place on this platform, and have a chance to be heard. Again an outright misinformed post, that couldn't even back itself up, needs to be here. You are defending and legitimizing it with this point of view. Much evil has been done in the world because people "tolerated" things and just let injustice slide.
>you don't believe Soros is a liberal propagandist
Yes, but practically everyone is a propagandist, and has bias. Though he has more sway because money speaks.
>I've seen ethnic conflict up close and see every sign that the US is heading in that direction.
Where have you been for the last 250 years? The US was founded on genocide and slavery. Ethnic conflict has been here forever.