Earlier quoted context omitted.
And it boots with the GPU which is not 3D accelerated in version 4 because the whole project was done by one person who just left. This is one of most popular SBCs out there. I wish it was a bit better.
Are there any high performance single-board computers on the market currently? I use a lot of Rpi's in personal projects, and I've been thinking about a home file server in a super small form-factor. What I would like is an SBC somewhere on the size scale of a smartphone, with performance in the range of a current flagship phone. Does something like this exist?
Wi-Fi packet capturing on M1 Macs is broken
141–150 of 166 posts
Re: Wi-Fi packet capturing on M1 Macs is broken
#142if wifi packet capturing is broken, then this effects web browsing too right? if most packets received are garbage, then this cuts down the bandwidth/download speed etc.?
Re: Wi-Fi packet capturing on M1 Macs is broken
#143Earlier quoted context omitted.
Does Big Sur let you loopback audio out yet, or are third-party extensions still required? Do Soundflower & BlackHole even work on M1? The fact there hasn't been native loopback for so long is mind-boggling. I'm a Mac user and use BlackHole. I've lost count of the number of times I've been on a call and someone with a Mac has gone to share screen and been confused as to why their audio isn't being shared. COVID/WFH h…
> Does Big Sur let you loopback audio out yet, or are third-party extensions still required? Do Soundflower & BlackHole even work on M1? How is that relevant to a discussion about worsening software quality? OS X never had native loopback.
Additionally, the comment was in response to a comment about audio interfaces, so it's relevant on multiple accounts.
Re: Wi-Fi packet capturing on M1 Macs is broken
#144Interesting that Apple still uses Broadcom Wi-Fi + BT chips in most of their product range despite lots of issues with them. Apple Watch nowadays is using Apple (codenamed Marconi) Wi-Fi + BT chips, hopefully they'll switch all their product lineup to those.
Would you have a link or article discussing this Marconi project? I’m always interested in Apple’s wireless chips designs. A web search brings me back to this thread.
Re: Wi-Fi packet capturing on M1 Macs is broken
#145Earlier quoted context omitted.
Honestly, it's easy to hate on Apple, but you start to appreciate macOS once you have to use Windows or Linux for anything serious. Yes, there is no good desktop OS, but macOS sucks the least, and by far.
I think that is just your opinion, and not objective truth. I am a happy debian user, currently forced to use macOS at my current company, and can't say I have a great time developping on a mac. As a web developper, Linux is great: native docker, native linux terminal experience... I however think this is a personnal opinoin, and I won't argue that Linux is better that macOS. If I has been a macOS user from the start…
I do however agree that it's 100% totally opinion based on ones preferred OS.
Re: Wi-Fi packet capturing on M1 Macs is broken
#146Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think that is just your opinion, and not objective truth. I am a happy debian user, currently forced to use macOS at my current company, and can't say I have a great time developping on a mac. As a web developper, Linux is great: native docker, native linux terminal experience... I however think this is a personnal opinoin, and I won't argue that Linux is better that macOS. If I has been a macOS user from the start…
macOS also has native Docker and native Terminal.app with a Unix tool chain just like Linux. So those two aren't great examples on their own IMO. I do however agree that it's 100% totally opinion based on ones preferred OS.
It's always just been a VM on Mac, hence the constant performance issues it faces.
Re: Wi-Fi packet capturing on M1 Macs is broken
#147Earlier quoted context omitted.
You can't compare these two markets. Whether or not these chips work well comes down to firmware and drivers, and every customer gets their own custom datasheet, firmware, and driver. If you hack that into something good, your product will be good. (You're going to need to fix a lot of code and of course have a lot of meetings. Worth it if you're selling a million units, I suppose.) If you just buy some chips off the…
Dell is also following the first route and they shipped a PC(alienware) with shitty broadcom drivers(that was a 4yrs ago). I have avoided broadcom ever since..
Re: Wi-Fi packet capturing on M1 Macs is broken
#148Earlier quoted context omitted.
Linux on desktop users shouldn’t be bemused until Linux desktop experience isn’t a pile of UX trash. Linux on the desktop is still so frustrating, ugly, and only marginally more useful over a Mac for extremely specific use cases, that I would rather use Windows + WSL2.
> Linux desktop experience isn’t a pile of UX trash. Desktop Linux is the only bearable desktop UX. Anyone who actually prefers the UX of desktop Windows is mentally deranged and should not be allowed to make user facing software.
Think a bit about what you say.
Re: Wi-Fi packet capturing on M1 Macs is broken
#149Earlier quoted context omitted.
Would you have a link or article discussing this Marconi project? I’m always interested in Apple’s wireless chips designs. A web search brings me back to this thread.
https://gist.github.com/woachk/943828f37c14563a607a26116435b... includes some tiny tidbits on it. The firmware can be extracted out of an IPSW/OTA download, where it is present in the Firmware directory.
Re: Wi-Fi packet capturing on M1 Macs is broken
#150Big Sur has been a significant drop in quality, even worse than Catalina. Some are bugs such as this one and some are just deliberately stupid design decisions like the changes to the notifications. I’m worried for the future of the Mac.
As Linux laptop user, I'm bemused when the competition gets worse. Maybe Linux on Apple Silicon will be the best of both worlds in a few years --- I think the dedicated porting effort will more than succeed and will get something more polished than Linux on Intel macs ever was.