Live data from Hacker News

I'm 34. Here's 34 things I wish I knew at 21

elliot.my

111–116 of 116 posts

Re: I'm 34. Here's 34 things I wish I knew at 21

#111
post #93

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>This was a revelation to me in my early-thirties Have you considered that this had less to do with how you acted but more with your marked value increasing and there's decreasing?

Ah, yes, thanks - good to remember some folks think women stop having “value” at 30ish, and still, somehow, feel comfortable posting that publicly.

Interesting how you focused on that and not men only being interesting once they gained material value and women being forced to settle which is far more superficial

Re: I'm 34. Here's 34 things I wish I knew at 21

#112

The best advise I ever got was this. https://youtu.be/sycgL3Qg_Ak?si=aDnxo-S6eYXJVheC&t=190 Don’t listen to other people’s advice. Nobody knows what the hell they’re doing. Just do your own thing.

So you took the advice of not taking other people's advice & you don't see the inherent contradiction in that?

There is no contradiction, i can give you the advice to live healthy and also tell you to not listen to my advice and do your own thing / research.

But I guess for people who are used these days to ask a word generator for live, love and health advice and end up telling a doctor in the ER that they don’t get why their liver is failing because ChatGPT must know it better, this concept is hard to grasp.

Best of luck to you.

Re: I'm 34. Here's 34 things I wish I knew at 21

#114
post #71

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you mean, by reporting statistics, you’re probably right. But men in general are widely used to physical abuse and are expected to take it. Granted, it is rarely significantly harmful and women use it as a way to reassure themselves that men are “in charge “ or whatever, but that doesn’t change the fact that it is vile behavior. Men’s behavior is as much shaped by female expectations as the behavior of women is mo…

Your assertion, which feels "right" to you, is by your own admission unprovable with available reporting facts. Give up that assertion. Violence in relationships can go both ways. Neither sex gets to "win" here.

Of -reported- incedents, 1 in 4 women report having been the victim of significant physical harm by an intimate partner, as do 1 in 7 men. Now if you consider the comparative likelihood of severe physical harm in M vs F and F vs M, and factor in the likelihood of reporting for women vs men, I think you can see that the rate is not at all what it seems at first glance.

(FWIW, despite the relative -frequency- of incidents , I do agree that the danger is greater to women just on the basis of the likelihood of harm in a MvF conflict.)

Reported incidence of psychological/emotional abuse are almost exactly at parity, with just under half of both sexes reporting abuse in their lifetime. Physical abuse prevalence in lesbian relationships is also much higher than either heterosexual or male-male relationships.

From this I would estimate that the willingness to act out in violence against a domestic partner is something close to evenly distributed among the sexes.

Collection of definitive data about subjects such as this is notoriously difficult, but reading between the lines both here and in violence among youth (m-m, f-f, m/f) seems to indicate that the predilection, if not the severity, of violence is relatively evenly distributed among.

Re: I'm 34. Here's 34 things I wish I knew at 21

#115
post #93

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Ah, yes, thanks - good to remember some folks think women stop having “value” at 30ish, and still, somehow, feel comfortable posting that publicly.

Interesting how you focused on that and not men only being interesting once they gained material value and women being forced to settle which is far more superficial

I focused on the bullshit Andrew Tate-isms - there was no need, whatsoever, to engage with any part of your comment, thought process or person, beyond that.

Re: I'm 34. Here's 34 things I wish I knew at 21

#116
post #115

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Interesting how you focused on that and not men only being interesting once they gained material value and women being forced to settle which is far more superficial

I focused on the bullshit Andrew Tate-isms - there was no need, whatsoever, to engage with any part of your comment, thought process or person, beyond that.

Andrew who? Sry 80/20 and co has been well established a decade before that boogieman
Post reply on HN