At any time, Tor is frequented by many like him. Some law enforcement, some working for child abuse organizations, some academia, and a lot of regular people with the same ambitions. Advertising a high child porn site is the best way to attract them. Most likely many of them have an unhealthy interest in this stuff, and line between "researcher" and paedophile is not always clear. The law does not make a distinction.
Running a Dark Web pedophile honeypot
101–110 of 185 posts
Re: Running a Dark Web pedophile honeypot
#102Did the FBI corporate with you? You said, you contacted them twice
Re: Running a Dark Web pedophile honeypot
#103Re: Running a Dark Web pedophile honeypot
#104Earlier quoted context omitted.
Their argument doesn't appear to be "Tor is bad because it can be used for bad stuff" but "Tor is bad because it is overwhelmingly used for bad stuff today ". That seems to be a meaningful distinction to me. (I don't really care about the argument/premise itself, I just find your sloppy attempt at a counter-argument to be weak)
Since we're talking about the devil: The biblical standard for acceptable collateral damage is kind of interesting. God in the old testament said he wouldn't smite a city if there are at least 10 righteous people in it. /theologynerd http://biblia.com/bible/nkjv/Gen%2018.20%E2%80%9333
That said, I've always been very fond of the passages in the OT where individuals managed to 'change' God's mind, as well as the general human emotions he appeared to have.
Re: Running a Dark Web pedophile honeypot
#105Maybe it's just me but I don't really like the tendency to treat pedophiles as if they are the devils themselves. Let there be no doubt. I have two kids and there is probably no limit to what I would do to someone who did anything to my kids. But it's not as simply as just condemning pedophiles for being that and I ultimately think there is something morally or ethically questionable about this approach. It's fairly…
I agree. I think people hate pedophiles in much the same way they hate(d) gays. Because it's disgusting and perverted, not because it harms people. The fact that some children do actually get harmed and that many people have children themselves that they feel very protective of fuels the emotion of labeling all pedophiles as "evil". If viewing an image of child abuse is wrong. Isn't viewing an image of ISIS beheading…
Re: Running a Dark Web pedophile honeypot
#106Earlier quoted context omitted.
There is no "just be watching". If you watch a child getting raped, you are committing a crime and better have a very convincing argument why you had to do it. It is in fact that simple. Of course they need help, too. We need both prosecution and prevention.
If you're watching game of thrones, you are watching people kill each other. You are committing a crime. See how that's silly? There are people who watch animated child porn and they are ruled as criminals even though no actual child was directly harmed. There are people who watch snuff films, where people actually are killed, and the viewers are not breaking the law in most states. Perhaps you would argue that snuff…
I don't equate animated child porn with actual child porn, much in the same way I don't equate the beheadings in GoT with the beheadings of IS. But to insinuate that the poster above would extend their 'committing a crime,' in the case of actual child rape, to something that is acted out for TV is an injustice to what they actually said. In essence, you just threw up a strawman and attacked it as a way of validating your final point (which, by most accounts, I agree with).
Re: Running a Dark Web pedophile honeypot
#107Earlier quoted context omitted.
Since we're talking about the devil: The biblical standard for acceptable collateral damage is kind of interesting. God in the old testament said he wouldn't smite a city if there are at least 10 righteous people in it. /theologynerd http://biblia.com/bible/nkjv/Gen%2018.20%E2%80%9333
Of course, him being God he would've probably known the exact amount of righteous individuals in the city. Not to mention being able to define 'righteous'. That said, I've always been very fond of the passages in the OT where individuals managed to 'change' God's mind, as well as the general human emotions he appeared to have.
Re: Running a Dark Web pedophile honeypot
#108Earlier quoted context omitted.
The war on drugs didn't work out as intended. The war on pedophilia seems much safer. Except of course for teenage sexting. Where the legal system has ruined lives for no reason. Or the weird edge cases it introduces. Such as a theoretical case where someone wearing Go Pro comes across a pedophile actively abusing a child out in the wild. The good samaritan Go Pro wearer is now guilty of both production and possessio…
800,000 people in the US are now on the sex offenders registry [1]. I think it has become clear to at least half the nation that the laws have gone too far on things like teen sexting or getting put on the registry for public urination. A friend of mine, her boyfriend is a trucker. He had pulled over to urinate along the side of the highway late at night, in the shadow cover of his truck. A state trooper had pulled o…
Re: Running a Dark Web pedophile honeypot
#109Earlier quoted context omitted.
Of course, him being God he would've probably known the exact amount of righteous individuals in the city. Not to mention being able to define 'righteous'. That said, I've always been very fond of the passages in the OT where individuals managed to 'change' God's mind, as well as the general human emotions he appeared to have.
“he”?