Earlier quoted context omitted.
They are. If you don't like this, buy someone else's phone.
That's not how competition works. Choice is good for consumers. I'm an AAPL shareholder too but that doesn't mean you should be an apologist. Someone else's phone won't access the huge amounts of data I have in iCloud. Or are you actually advocating for vendor lock-in as a force for good? I don't understand.
Apple Removes American Civil War Games from the App Store
121–130 of 226 posts
Re: Apple Removes American Civil War Games from the App Store
#122This is a very Apple move. When I saw it, I wasn't surprised. There are Civil War games where it makes total sense for the flag to show, and there are probably a few tasteless "The south will rise again" things that never should have been allowed on in the first place. But it takes a lot of people and time to figure it out for each app on the store. And when it comes to this kind of stuff Apple doesn't like spending…
They've already approved these apps. They already have the people to approve these apps.
> And when it comes to this kind of stuff Apple doesn't like spending lots of people and time on these kind of things.
Incorrect. They've already demonstrated they want to do this. After all, you had to have people find and remove these apps in the first place.
Re: Apple Removes American Civil War Games from the App Store
#123Earlier quoted context omitted.
I strongly suspect they wrote that expressively in case a court ever looks at Apple's policies, and needs to decide if Apple is silencing art/freedom of speech Why would that end up in court? Apple is a private company. It's free to include/exclude whatever content it wants. Consumers don't have a right to force a company to provide the content they want.
Using a monopoly position in the market to influence what kind of media is available on the market at large, however, can get you in trouble with courts. Get in trouble for anti-monopoly stuff usually requires two parts: that you be a monopoly and that you somehow use it. Shaping a market to your desires is an example of using your monopoly standing. Apple won't get in trouble because they're not a monopoly, but that…
IANAL, but I feel like there were previous monopoly cases successfully brought on behalf of far smaller groups than that. E.g. the fact that I'm a vegetarian doesn't invalidate a steak-knife monopoly
Re: Apple Removes American Civil War Games from the App Store
#124Earlier quoted context omitted.
Very true. I don't like the idea of being so rigid though. It seems like Americans stick to the idea of things like free speech or right to bear arms (basically constitutional ideas) without considering the fact they may not be right or times have changed. It's almost a religious zealotry as evidenced by the quick down voting of my post. NB (to everyone not noarchy): Down down vote things you disagree with - down vot…
>Down down vote things you disagree with - down vote things that don't add to the conversation. The irony is palpable.
Re: Apple Removes American Civil War Games from the App Store
#125Here is part of Mississippi's Declaration of Secession: "Our position is thoroughly identified with the institution of slavery - the greatest material interest of the world. Its labor supplies the product, which constitutes by far the largest and most important portions of commerce of the earth. These products are peculiar to the climate verging on the tropical regions, and by an imperious law of nature, none but the…
It's easy for people to get tripped up by their own ideologies and lose site of the time period that the Civil War occurred in. If you're all about states' rights these days, it's easy to focus on that part of the Civil War because it fits your narrative. Unfortunately it ignores that the only states' right that they were really concerned with was that which kept slavery legal.
I know this because there was definitely a time when I felt that way. Thankfully I eventually realized I was wrong.
Re: Apple Removes American Civil War Games from the App Store
#126Earlier quoted context omitted.
yes, they actually are. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swastika#Germany
No, they are not: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9777948
Re: Apple Removes American Civil War Games from the App Store
#127Earlier quoted context omitted.
Burying our head in the sand about the nature of our history won't make the racism we have today go away. If anything, it will aggravate it further as racists will find this a tool to promote their agenda.
Of course it won't make racism go away. Its banning has the positive effect of making overtly racist symbols less socially acceptable. It will aggravate anger amongst racists but I don't think it will spread said racism.
Re: Apple Removes American Civil War Games from the App Store
#128American Civil War games are not racist nor is representing the Civil War or any other conflict in a game. What is next? Scrubbing history books of any offending flag or words?
Re: Apple Removes American Civil War Games from the App Store
#129Here is part of Mississippi's Declaration of Secession: "Our position is thoroughly identified with the institution of slavery - the greatest material interest of the world. Its labor supplies the product, which constitutes by far the largest and most important portions of commerce of the earth. These products are peculiar to the climate verging on the tropical regions, and by an imperious law of nature, none but the…
Indoctrination with these beliefs in pretty common at high schools in places like Mississippi and S. Carolina, and even at (rural) high schools in border states. We watched Gone With the Wind in my History class in high school. Not when discussing e.g. "the role of film in civil rights/modern history" mind you, but when discussing reconstruction. It was pretty explicitly treated as a more-or-less accurate portrayal.
Re: Apple Removes American Civil War Games from the App Store
#130Earlier quoted context omitted.
Burying our head in the sand about the nature of our history won't make the racism we have today go away. If anything, it will aggravate it further as racists will find this a tool to promote their agenda.
I concur, and I think it might be doing even more disservice as many will shortly be quick to say "Racism? Racism isn't a problem. We got rid of the Confederate flag." By removing the visible signs of issues, you remove the easiest ways to talk about and educate others about the issue.