Chrome doesn't really like the URLs, and Twitter doesn't see them either. Awesome, though.
http://to/ World's Shortest URL Shortener
11–20 of 150 posts
Re: http://to/ World's Shortest URL Shortener
#12Chrome doesn't really like the URLs, and Twitter doesn't see them either. Awesome, though.
Re: http://to/ World's Shortest URL Shortener
#13Re: http://to/ World's Shortest URL Shortener
#14Can someone give me a quick introduction on how this was done?
Re: http://to/ World's Shortest URL Shortener
#15Re: http://to/ World's Shortest URL Shortener
#16Re: http://to/ World's Shortest URL Shortener
#17Seems to require a dot in the URL: This: http://to./z0ba1 Not this: http://to/z0ba1
Depends on your DNS. Works for some without.
With the dot it works, but then the browser fixes up the url, and removes the dot - so all subsequent requests don't work.
(This is for me, using firefox on linux.)
Re: http://to/ World's Shortest URL Shortener
#18Can someone give me a quick introduction on how this was done?
2- The real domain we're looking at: "to" -- no "suffix" attached (TLD: top-level domain)
3- The .to registry added an A-record for the "to" domain, which resolves correctly.
[Edit: Looks like .cm does this too:
;; ANSWER SECTION:
cm. 86400 IN A 195.24.205.60]
Re: http://to/ World's Shortest URL Shortener
#19Earlier quoted context omitted.
Depends on your DNS. Works for some without.
The dns works. But the browser doesn't. Without the trailing dot the browser looks up the .com address. With the dot it works, but then the browser fixes up the url, and removes the dot - so all subsequent requests don't work. (This is for me, using firefox on linux.)
edited for spelling mistake
Re: http://to/ World's Shortest URL Shortener
#20Chrome doesn't really like the URLs, and Twitter doesn't see them either. Awesome, though.
Not the world's best URL shortener...