Live data from Hacker News

http://to/ World's Shortest URL Shortener

to.

11–20 of 150 posts

Re: http://to/ World's Shortest URL Shortener

#17
post #9
post #7

Seems to require a dot in the URL: This: http://to./z0ba1 Not this: http://to/z0ba1

Depends on your DNS. Works for some without.

The dns works. But the browser doesn't. Without the trailing dot the browser looks up the .com address.

With the dot it works, but then the browser fixes up the url, and removes the dot - so all subsequent requests don't work.

(This is for me, using firefox on linux.)

Re: http://to/ World's Shortest URL Shortener

#18

Can someone give me a quick introduction on how this was done?

1- Periods (.) don't do anything after a domain (ie www.weebly.com.), but they are useful for preventing the browsers from redirecting to http://www.to.com/

2- The real domain we're looking at: "to" -- no "suffix" attached (TLD: top-level domain)

3- The .to registry added an A-record for the "to" domain, which resolves correctly.

[Edit: Looks like .cm does this too:

;; ANSWER SECTION:

cm. 86400 IN A 195.24.205.60]

Re: http://to/ World's Shortest URL Shortener

#19
post #17
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Depends on your DNS. Works for some without.

The dns works. But the browser doesn't. Without the trailing dot the browser looks up the .com address. With the dot it works, but then the browser fixes up the url, and removes the dot - so all subsequent requests don't work. (This is for me, using firefox on linux.)

seems safari users are struggling without the . as well .. probably a webkit issue then

edited for spelling mistake

Re: http://to/ World's Shortest URL Shortener

#20
post #8

Chrome doesn't really like the URLs, and Twitter doesn't see them either. Awesome, though.

Funny, it's working under my current configuration with Firefox but not with Opera and Chrome translates it in a Google search.

Not the world's best URL shortener...

Post reply on HN