Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Entering an amount per transaction might be burdensome to the average consumer Shoppers have dealt with counting out money for millenia. The time spent is a small price to pay for total security against remote theft. At the very least, those of us who are not terminally lazy ought to have the option of paying it. > a display on the card that simply verifies the amount charged on most recent transaction Ever have yo…
> Shoppers have dealt with counting out money for millenia. People have also worked 16 hour days to feed their families for millenia; no one's going to do that now. The amount of effort something takes almost always decreases. > The time spent is a small price to pay for total security against remote theft. At the very least, those of us who are not terminally lazy ought to have the option of paying it. How does this…
A built-in LCD gives you a single-use credit card number. (Such a product already exists, though a Windows-only PC app.)
> If you want to spend $25 to get an RSA token to provide a code every time you purchase something, I don't see anything wrong with that service being offered to you.
And yet the service is offered by no one, and I don't think anyone has yet tried and failed.
> Again, I don't see how a two-factor system would prevent this
A number is good for one transaction, like a gift card code. In the case of my proposed scheme, it is effectively a PGP message signed with your private key, containing the transaction amount, recipient, and a serial number. The bank shall not process any attempted transaction which is not signed by an account holder's key or contains a duplicate serial number.