Earlier quoted context omitted.
Is there proof of this happening? It sort of sounds like conspiracies a paranoid person would come up with.
No one doubts that it's happening. But the reasoning and the mechanisms are opaque, which leads people to speculate.
Dear Paul
171–180 of 184 posts
Re: Dear Paul
#172Lets look at some of Zed Shaw's comments. I hate abusive fucks, and right now HN is so abusive and out of control that someone has to do something about it. I've just looked at his blog and it is full of insults and slurs about other people. He's a hypocrite. Currently the most popular way to slander someone on HN is to create a “throwaway” or “anon” account, say what you want, then slink off into the shadows like a…
Re: Dear Paul
#173Re: Dear Paul
#174Disappointing to see this at 139 points in under an hour (and still going...). It's just a lot of bile. I like Zed when he's talking about software development. I like tptacek when he's talking about cryptography or money or cooking or any of the other several subjects he's reasonably skilled in. I like pg when he's talking about startups. All of them are capable of getting their hackles up, getting in fights, saying…
But the bile is mostly correct. HN has a severe problem of a lack of civility between people actually here, and that problems gets worse the further away the person being talked about is. HN is a really unpleasant place to be sometimes. (I know I'm guilty of this sometimes, and I welcome downvotes to steer me)
It sounds like a silly thing to say at first glance, but the less actively you participate on HN (or Reddit, or Slashdot, or probably most places), the better the community seems.
Otherwise it's too easy to make the mistake of getting really invested in the small dramas, like this one.
Re: Dear Paul
#175Earlier quoted context omitted.
He has nearly 9000 karma which you don't get by being completely disconnected from how this community works.
> He has nearly 9000 karma which you don't get by being completely disconnected from how this community works. Sure you can. Karma is mostly an indicator of tending to post things that are popular, and there's a pretty big bonus to that if you happen to have name recognition as a popular figure. If you're a popular figure and your natural inclination in writing is in a direction which would be generally well-received…
Re: Dear Paul
#176Earlier quoted context omitted.
There are direct and there are underhanded attacks. Unfortunately, only the former are really condemned.
Try directly criticizing anything Zed has written and see what you reap. For instance: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1570694
Perhaps I've missed the egregious thing you were referring to in that thread, but many of his responses to your (numerous!) replies asked for specific stats behind your assertions, and I think it's telling for our industry that you had none (I also have none, yet believe I'll never have to care), which for a person trying to write a fast server by deliberately doing things differently, you can see why he wouldn't be so quick to drop the question and defer to your unsolicited wisdom.
Re: Dear Paul
#177Earlier quoted context omitted.
"Is HN a thing that can be abusive?" Absolutely. In the past I've watched karma burn as much as 30/40 points drop because I made some point that isn't what was expected. That's not the real problem. The real problem is the stream of stupid non helpful and nasty comments. "HN would be a very different place if it was trying to behave in a "role model" fashion toward the tech community." Suggested this but what I've re…
The real abuse is what happens beyond the walls of this forum. HN has an outsized influence on the startup culture in San Francisco and the tech community across the world. People read things here and it affects how they view the technology they use and the people they interact with.
Difficult to tease apart HN and YC. From the outside HN may look like YC but isn't. Agree though. Didn't use to be like this. Nobody cared.
Re: Dear Paul
#178Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Against all of that, anyway, HN seems incredibly tame to me. Comparitive badness of online forums is just a variant of Dawkin's "Dear Muslima" nonsense.
Agreed in full--because X is really bad, Y should not get a pass for being mostly bad. And if laundry's going to get aired, there's a ton of virulently racist, sexist, and anti-poor garbage that gets thrown around here, not even by green accounts, that actually gets voted up. HN has a problem. I've discussed it offline with people, including dang. Nobody seems to have a solution for it, but a solution needs to exist.…
Re: Dear Paul
#179Earlier quoted context omitted.
Agreed in full--because X is really bad, Y should not get a pass for being mostly bad. And if laundry's going to get aired, there's a ton of virulently racist, sexist, and anti-poor garbage that gets thrown around here, not even by green accounts, that actually gets voted up. HN has a problem. I've discussed it offline with people, including dang. Nobody seems to have a solution for it, but a solution needs to exist.…
Given the popularity of my comparison, I think you've already lost that battle.
Re: Dear Paul
#180Earlier quoted context omitted.
The real abuse is what happens beyond the walls of this forum. HN has an outsized influence on the startup culture in San Francisco and the tech community across the world. People read things here and it affects how they view the technology they use and the people they interact with.
"HN has an outsized influence on the startup culture in San Francisco and the tech community across the world." Difficult to tease apart HN and YC. From the outside HN may look like YC but isn't. Agree though. Didn't use to be like this. Nobody cared.