Live data from Hacker News

Class action lawsuit filed against Lenovo over Superfish

unitedstatescourts.org

201–210 of 239 posts

Re: Class action lawsuit filed against Lenovo over Superfish

#201
post #140
post #94

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Absolutely not true. I control purchasing for my company, and have caused to be purchased a bunch of Lenovo's. No more, though.

I will continue to order as many Lenovo machines as I need. It is more important to me that the vendor serves my needs than what HN thinks about them. I'm not buying something crappy for my purposes because HN is mad.

I consider what Lenovo did a breach of trust. That's enough for me to turn away from them.

Re: Class action lawsuit filed against Lenovo over Superfish

#202
post #168

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is a strange comment. Most people I see on HN like Lenovo because of the quality of their machines. Where I can see a purchasing manager or head of IT against them at the moment is because they surreptitiously installed software which caused a security risk. If you're fine with your company's data possibly being compromised in the future then continue your ordering from Lenovo. I will still buy from them because…

What makes it a strange comment? Aren't the two of you saying the same thing?

Not really. The 'just because HN is mad' makes it sound like all the people here are boycotting Lenovo for irrational reasons. I don't think HN is 'mad' at the company, they just have some legitimate concerns.

Re: Class action lawsuit filed against Lenovo over Superfish

#203
post #96

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>If you've been sued once for something, you cannot be sued again (and again, and again) Double jeopardy doesn't prevent someone from opting out of a class action lawsuit and suing separately. >hot coffee lawsuit The hot coffee case wasn't a class action lawsuit.

Also the hot coffee lawsuit wasn't as stupid as people make out. The McDonald's coffee really was hot and gave Stella Liebeck some nasty burns.

Even if the coffee had kill her is still stupid; lets put it this way: making the coffee inhumanly hot is just as smart as cleaning the cups with cyanide, but we don't have a law that forbids cup cleaning with cyanide (or a silly message in every cup about it)

Re: Class action lawsuit filed against Lenovo over Superfish

#205

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But corporations are individuals! Could two wrongs make a right?

So put the corporation in jail; take its personal items and lock them away, don't allow any outside communications except through visits, no access to bank accounts, etc. On a more serious note, what happens to the author[ing company] of the software used to inject ads? http://www.komodia.com/about

Or, direct 100% of net profits to the state, in order to pay the prisoner's fines. The articles of incorporation should be sufficient to imprison.

Think this insane? Look up in rem jurisdiction. You'll see cool lawsuits such as "UNITED STATES V. $50,000 IN CASH". I'd consider that precedent.

Re: Class action lawsuit filed against Lenovo over Superfish

#206
post #202

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What makes it a strange comment? Aren't the two of you saying the same thing?

Not really. The 'just because HN is mad' makes it sound like all the people here are boycotting Lenovo for irrational reasons. I don't think HN is 'mad' at the company, they just have some legitimate concerns.

Ah, I think it's possible HN to be rationally mad, but I still wouldn't weight that factor. I thought all pekk was saying is "I evaulate my needs, not HN's needs".

Re: Class action lawsuit filed against Lenovo over Superfish

#207
post #195

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What would the criminal charges be? The best outline for a prosecution I've seen goes something like "CFAA, mumble mumble, spying is bad." What specific law was broken? Lay out the case. For bonus points, pretend you're the defense attorney, and then outline the defense's case.

> What would the criminal charges be? Not a lawyer but quoting from the document. COMPLAINT FOR: 1) VIOLATION OF COMPUTER FRAUD AND ABUSE ACT (18 U.S.C. § 1030, et seq.); 2) VIOLATION OF FEDERAL WIRETAP ACT (18 U.S.C. § 2510, et seq.); 3) VIOLATION OF THE STORED COMMUNICATIONS ACT (18 U.S.C. § 2701, et seq.); 4) VIOLATION OF CALIFORNIA INVASION OF PRIVACY ACT, PENAL CODE §§ 631, 637.2; 5) VIOLATION OF CALIFORNIA BUS.…

Thanks, though I'm a little suspicious when I see this:

  2) VIOLATION OF FEDERAL WIRETAP ACT (18 U.S.C. § 2510, et seq.);
  3) VIOLATION OF THE STORED COMMUNICATIONS ACT (18 U.S.C. § 2701, et seq.);
You'd think one or the other, no? (AFAIK Superfish didn't touch anything even remotely covered by SCA). This looks like classic "all of the torts" shotgun filing. Which makes sense for a civil case, but it's not much of a guide as to what criminal cases would be viable.

Re: Class action lawsuit filed against Lenovo over Superfish

#208
I purchased a Lenovo laptop in December, and it was one of the ones with SuperFish. They refused to give me a refund, because it was outside of their 30 day refund policy. It would be impossible to get a refund for SuperFish because the info came out in February and they were only infecting systems between September and December.

However, there is a happy ending to this story. I went through my credit card company to get a refund, and it was taken care of no problem. The CC company was incredibly responsive and shocked about SuperFish.

I'm quite pleased, as SuperFish aside, this is the worst computer I've ever owned (Y50 UHD.)

Re: Class action lawsuit filed against Lenovo over Superfish

#209

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't buy Apple computers but isn't that a main selling point with osx?

Depends on whether you consider iTunes crapware :-)

iTunes isn't crapware on OS X. It is on Windows though, I think mostly because Apple doesn't want to put too many resources into iTunes on Windows.

iTunes on OS X runs better than any other music apps (that are not command line music clients like ncmpcpp) I've used, and I've used a lot. On OS X, I can't see why people would call it bloatware/crapware.

Re: Class action lawsuit filed against Lenovo over Superfish

#210

I purchased a Lenovo laptop in December, and it was one of the ones with SuperFish. They refused to give me a refund, because it was outside of their 30 day refund policy. It would be impossible to get a refund for SuperFish because the info came out in February and they were only infecting systems between September and December. However, there is a happy ending to this story. I went through my credit card company to…

You filed a chargeback against Lenovo and kept the laptop, or returned it? Was the laptop purchased from a dealer or direct?
Post reply on HN