Earlier quoted context omitted.
> It simply does not make sense to me anymore to try and build high speed rail on the ground, on fixed "rails" in order to not even get close to even slow airplane speeds. Planes have higher max speeds, but they're subject to weather delays and other issues that bring their average speeds down well into maglev territory. > With the roll-out of more sophisticated air traffic control systems that will allow denser traf…
You are not thinking objectively, it's quite obvious. Not only will weather impact the operation and speed of a maglev just as much if not more considering that high winds and / or blistering heat can significantly impact the train and track. And if you think that a few storms disrupting the air transportation network is a problem because some idiots thought it was a good idea to make Chicago a hub then you are not t…
Planes are frequently grounded/delayed by weather systems trains would have no trouble transiting, particularly thunderstorms.
> I don't think you could even pay for all the rail lines that would need to be built in order to serve the same number of passengers between the same number of destinations as you can flexibly adapt to with air travel.
Once again, you pretend like this doesn't already exist throughout Europe and Japan already.