Earlier quoted context omitted.
It is meant to be. Stubborn ignorance deserves ridicule.
ugh, didn't really think the "tough guy i am very smart" thing was on HN
America's obsession with STEM education is dangerous
91–96 of 96 posts
Re: America's obsession with STEM education is dangerous
#92Earlier quoted context omitted.
The way people live today is extremely unhealthy. Cooped up in cities like factory farms, eating mass produced "food" and becoming morbidly obese. The best way to improve your quality of life is not to look to science (Unless you're actually ill), it's to look to nature.
Nah. People living in cities are healthier and less obese than their counterparts living in the suburbs, rural areas, and small towns. The best way to improve your life is to look to science. Please stop spreading ignorance around. You're actively working to hold society's progress back.
Re: America's obsession with STEM education is dangerous
#93Re: America's obsession with STEM education is dangerous
#94Earlier quoted context omitted.
You're being a little dramatic. "People who do not believe in evolution are holding back progress" ... Honestly... The cool thing about science is that whether you think gravity is real or not you will still fall. Progress will always be made in due time..
I present to you Texas science textbooks and their treatment of the theory of evolution. Or shall we teach our future engineers that Pi is exactly 3 too? Ignorant people with influence is a terrible thing.
Re: America's obsession with STEM education is dangerous
#95A broad general education helps foster critical thinking and creativity. Indeed. But critical thinking and creativity are the things second least prized in US classrooms, right after outright disobedience. So it's no real wonder that broad, general education has fallen out of favor.
> Indeed. But critical thinking and creativity are the things second least prized in US classrooms, right after outright disobedience. Really? I never got downgraded for giving an answer that the teacher disagreed with, rather I was given good marks for being able to clearly present my side of a discussion. For the classes I took that were subjective, History, English (in regards to literary critiques), etc, it was m…
I don't happen to think so either. Sorry I gave that impression. I think that a bias against creativity and critical thinking exists as emergent behavior. Teachers and administrators have to get things done, there's tests to give and grade, forms to fill out, report cards to send out, and loads of standardized testing upon which schools and teachers are rated. Some random kid arguing against some question on a standardized test only disrupts the entire thing. There is a bias, I don't think you can deny it, and it's all emergent, a second order effect of other things.