Live data from Hacker News

Sublime Text 3 Build 3080

sublimetext.com

121–130 of 190 posts

Re: Sublime Text 3 Build 3080

#121

Besides Firefox, Sublime Text is the application I use the most in my day-to-day professional life. It is faster and easier to configure than any other code editor I've used in the past. I would say it's one of the few pieces of software I've encountered that is a joy to use. If you also use ST regularly and can afford it, I highly encourage you to support development and buy a license right now.

[deleted]

Re: Sublime Text 3 Build 3080

#122
post #115

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Emacs's package manager does come with Emacs, starting with some recent version (I don't know which version, though).

Emacs 24, released in 2012.

I hoped that was the answer, but feared it was more like 24.3 or 25.

Re: Sublime Text 3 Build 3080

#123
post #74

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Personally I wasn't convinced until I also tried out the "Sublime SFTP" plugin.. I'm never going back.

Hopefully in this day and age, you are using that plugin to SFTP into a virtual machine locally.

No clue what that is meant to mean.

SFTP is as secure as any other SSH connection and people use those extremely regularly to remotely administer hosts which lack a VPN.

Aside from terrible Windows support SFTP is likely one of the best secure remote file transfer protocols around (in particular for freeform file transfers, rather than structured like AS2 or similar).

Certainly better than FTPS.

Re: Sublime Text 3 Build 3080

#124
post #74

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Personally I wasn't convinced until I also tried out the "Sublime SFTP" plugin.. I'm never going back.

Hopefully in this day and age, you are using that plugin to SFTP into a virtual machine locally.

I only do web development occasionally so excuse my ignorance, but what is the common way to deploy a website now?

Re: Sublime Text 3 Build 3080

#125

OT: What are some tips (or plugins) to be more productive on ST3?

In case anyone isn't aware, Package Control[0] adds an incredibly simple package manager to Sublime in order to automatically install/update plugins. After that's been installed, I'd recommend browsing the popular packages (already linked in another comment) or just hitting Ctrl+Shift+P, "Install", and searching for the names of languages/tools you use.

One plugin I'd recommend for anyone is All Autocomplete. It extends Sublime's autocomplete detection to match across any open file, and not only the current file.

Also Ctrl+Shift+P searches through all of Sublime's and your plugins available actions. Ctrl+P allows you to switch files without your mouse.

[0] https://packagecontrol.io/installation

Re: Sublime Text 3 Build 3080

#126
post #110

I see lots of comments from people saying that after years of usage they just recently bought a license. I'm curious what most people are using it for, since the license clearly states that you need to buy a copy for professional use.

Actually, it's more 'strict' than that:

"Sublime Text may be downloaded and evaluated for free, however a license must be purchased for continued use."

Personally, I was happy to purchase a license because I think it's a great application, but I admit that it's on the pricey side.

Re: Sublime Text 3 Build 3080

#127
post #70

I'm reliefed that development progressed again this year. You don't want to invest time on a dead editor.

>You don't want to invest time on a dead editor. And this is why it's important for your editor to be free software. Emacs isn't going anywhere, and they don't have unjust control over my computing.

>they don't have unjust control over my computing

I don't understand this. What is unjust about a software author charging for their work? I and many others are happy and willing to pay.

Re: Sublime Text 3 Build 3080

#128
post #108

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm the opposite - bought a license years ago but don't actually use it for much except plaintext. In my experience the core editor is fast and rock solid, but I think every single extension I've tried has been somewhere between glitchy and completely broken, and debugging/fixing them has soaked up more time than they'd save if they worked perfectly. Part of the problem may be that extensions seem remarkably keen to…

> Or maybe I've just been unlucky/incompetent. Every lint extension I've seen seems to drag a full install of whatever the popular implementation of the language is.

> seems to drag a full install of whatever the popular implementation of the language is.

This is the biggest problem with sublime plugins. dependencies. It is also 100% why I refuse to add non-python dependencies to any plugins I write (which has really just been JsFormat thus far)

Re: Sublime Text 3 Build 3080

#129
post #118
post #110

I see lots of comments from people saying that after years of usage they just recently bought a license. I'm curious what most people are using it for, since the license clearly states that you need to buy a copy for professional use.

Aside from the obvious alternative of "personal use," are you really surprised that people aren't always in full compliance with their EULAs?

I've found that I pay much more attention to the terms of use for projects supported by smaller teams -- it's hard to feel like I'm ripping off a giant company like Adobe, but I have a hard time telling a small shop basically "HA! Thanks for trusting me stupid, good luck developing your great product with no money."

Re: Sublime Text 3 Build 3080

#130

I love the 'Goto Symbol (in Project)...' feature, but I really wish the input would be populated with text you have selected in the editor. This way you could jump to a function/whatever underneath the cursor by doing something like: Cmd-D, Cmd-(Shift-)R, Enter - instead of copy-pasting, or retyping the symbol. I added this to the mass of suggestions in the ST forum, but I guess it has been lost or rejected :(

For me, Cmd+Opt+[Down Arrow] jumps to definition. I don't think I set that up as a custom keybinding anywhere.
Post reply on HN