Earlier quoted context omitted.
A lot of water in California goes to farming. They'll have to close farms, which will drive up prices of produce.
Until new farms capitalize on the opportunity to capture the market in places where there's an abundance of water.
California has about one year of water left
31–40 of 405 posts
Re: California has about one year of water left
#32Re: California has about one year of water left
#33Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's not going to be easy to build few of them in less than a year.
It's amazing what you can do when you've run out of water... But you are right, it would/will be a massive undertaking. I wonder if desalination will become water's "fracking", something we only turn to due to high price of what we used before or unavailability of what we used before.
Re: California has about one year of water left
#34I wish there was some way to change prices to alter demand. Maybe a "task force of thought leaders" can crack open an Econ 101 textbook and look at the supply and demand curve on the first page. Sorry for the sarcasm, I'm just disappointed in the "reach for regulation first" approach to dealing with shortages.
You're right, if people can't afford water to drink, they're clearly not valuable enough to live. If a farm can't afford water for crops, the crops weren't profitable enough to grow anyway. And if the rest of the nation can't afford food since some foods will be scarce without California farms, they should just be more productive. No need for regulation!
As for your other points, yes. Allowing farmers to use a common resource for free effectively subsidizes them. It'd make a lot more sense for everyone to grow those crops in places like Florida instead of in the middle of the desert.
Re: California has about one year of water left
#35So what happens when they run out of water? Are there water sources that are just undrinkable that can be cleaned up; similar to fracking now being cheap enough to compete with OPEC is there no water or just no drinkable water? Can they just "ship" or "pipe" the water in from neighboring states or are they too on the edge of a draught. Is this country-wide, just Western states, or just California and can other states…
My understanding is that under most scenarios water for humans is fine, but agriculture will be totally dead in California.
And that's going to happen right before the 2016 presidential election.
Re: California has about one year of water left
#36So what happens when they run out of water? Are there water sources that are just undrinkable that can be cleaned up; similar to fracking now being cheap enough to compete with OPEC is there no water or just no drinkable water? Can they just "ship" or "pipe" the water in from neighboring states or are they too on the edge of a draught. Is this country-wide, just Western states, or just California and can other states…
My understanding is that under most scenarios water for humans is fine, but agriculture will be totally dead in California.
Re: California has about one year of water left
#37Earlier quoted context omitted.
My understanding is that under most scenarios water for humans is fine, but agriculture will be totally dead in California.
Ahh, ok they hinted at that in the article but for some reason it didn't click in my head. I wonder if the farmers will just move to neighboring states (not that it's easy to pick up and move a farm....) losing farms in California would be a huge loss: > California produces a sizable majority of many American fruits, vegetables, and nuts: 99 percent of artichokes, 99 percent of walnuts, 97 percent of kiwis, 97 percen…
Re: California has about one year of water left
#38A historical view: http://www.city-journal.org/2015/25_1_california-drought.htm...
It's almost thirty years old now, but the history is just as relevant, and the warnings issued similarly prescient.
Re: California has about one year of water left
#39Earlier quoted context omitted.
You're right, if people can't afford water to drink, they're clearly not valuable enough to live. If a farm can't afford water for crops, the crops weren't profitable enough to grow anyway. And if the rest of the nation can't afford food since some foods will be scarce without California farms, they should just be more productive. No need for regulation!
It makes more sense to farm in places that have reliable sources of water. I don't see why we need to subsidize California's crops, especially when we have so much great soil wasted on corn. Farming, in general, in the US is fairly messed up. Perhaps this crisis will lead to a fix. Maintaining the status quo and pretending everything is okay via regulation and political corruption is what got us here. Lets not contin…
Re: California has about one year of water left
#40So what happens when they run out of water? Are there water sources that are just undrinkable that can be cleaned up; similar to fracking now being cheap enough to compete with OPEC is there no water or just no drinkable water? Can they just "ship" or "pipe" the water in from neighboring states or are they too on the edge of a draught. Is this country-wide, just Western states, or just California and can other states…