This article is at best misguided. OS X 10.10 DNS is not broken, it is working as intended - just differently from the past. Standards have changed and many haven't noticed. All of the bugs cited have to do with ".local" domains. You should never use .local domains as IANA has designated this domain as a special use domain for Multicast DNS as part of IP Zeroconf and Bonjour. http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6762 Apple…
Why DNS in OS X 10.10 is broken, and what you can do to fix it
11–20 of 65 posts
Re: Why DNS in OS X 10.10 is broken, and what you can do to fix it
#12I had the " is already in use" problem, the safari not able to resolve any hostname and I could not use wake on demand for almost 2 years because of some bug. Maybe I am unusually unlucky but I agree that the quality of the last OS X releases has clearly got worse. The problem with apple software is that if it doesn't "just work" there is little to do about it. I am not so sure about reenabling mDNSResponder. This ma…
Their software has improved on the mobile front, it seems that's where all their engineers focus these days. It is sad that mac users long for the stability, speed and simple effectiveness of previous versions.
Re: Why DNS in OS X 10.10 is broken, and what you can do to fix it
#13This article is at best misguided. OS X 10.10 DNS is not broken, it is working as intended - just differently from the past. Standards have changed and many haven't noticed. All of the bugs cited have to do with ".local" domains. You should never use .local domains as IANA has designated this domain as a special use domain for Multicast DNS as part of IP Zeroconf and Bonjour. http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6762 Apple…
Re: Why DNS in OS X 10.10 is broken, and what you can do to fix it
#14This article is at best misguided. OS X 10.10 DNS is not broken, it is working as intended - just differently from the past. Standards have changed and many haven't noticed. All of the bugs cited have to do with ".local" domains. You should never use .local domains as IANA has designated this domain as a special use domain for Multicast DNS as part of IP Zeroconf and Bonjour. http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6762 Apple…
My Yosemite fails frequently resolving common domain names (.com). Has that something to do with .local domains and how could I fix it?
Re: Why DNS in OS X 10.10 is broken, and what you can do to fix it
#15This article is at best misguided. OS X 10.10 DNS is not broken, it is working as intended - just differently from the past. Standards have changed and many haven't noticed. All of the bugs cited have to do with ".local" domains. You should never use .local domains as IANA has designated this domain as a special use domain for Multicast DNS as part of IP Zeroconf and Bonjour. http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6762 Apple…
Another Yosemite daemon addition, recentsd, had serious issues (for example: substantial memory leaks when interacting with Mail.app) until 10.10.2.
Apple has gotten very good at eliminating crashes. They're obviously using the reporting mechanism there to great effect. But at the same time, Console.app has never been noisier, and failures that don't result in crashes seem to linger far too long.
They've also become, it seems, far more dependent on an "orchestra" of daemon processes to perform tasks that in the past would have been implemented in passive frameworks used separately by each app. That adds complexity of coordination, and meanwhile a single failure can affect every "client" app on the system.
Re: Why DNS in OS X 10.10 is broken, and what you can do to fix it
#16I've come to the realisation that I don't trust Apple software much these days. I used to upgrade to the latest version of both phone and computer OS quickly, but these days I'll hold on as long as I can - I'm still on 10.9, and waiting for the inevitable software upgrade that will make me have to pull the trigger. I miss the Snow Leopard days.
Re: Why DNS in OS X 10.10 is broken, and what you can do to fix it
#17This article is at best misguided. OS X 10.10 DNS is not broken, it is working as intended - just differently from the past. Standards have changed and many haven't noticed. All of the bugs cited have to do with ".local" domains. You should never use .local domains as IANA has designated this domain as a special use domain for Multicast DNS as part of IP Zeroconf and Bonjour. http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6762 Apple…
Yeah, but the rewrite is buggy as rewrites often are. If it worked as intended, I doubt so many people would have so many problems.
Re: Why DNS in OS X 10.10 is broken, and what you can do to fix it
#18DNS is broken in 10.10? Haven't had a single problem...
Re: Why DNS in OS X 10.10 is broken, and what you can do to fix it
#19This article is at best misguided. OS X 10.10 DNS is not broken, it is working as intended - just differently from the past. Standards have changed and many haven't noticed. All of the bugs cited have to do with ".local" domains. You should never use .local domains as IANA has designated this domain as a special use domain for Multicast DNS as part of IP Zeroconf and Bonjour. http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6762 Apple…
The counter argument to this is that the RFC is exceedingly new, and directly from Apple. Microsoft has been using .local in example (and recommending them for production) AD builds for a decade. I see what Apple is going for, and I don't mind the idea, but the practical results are frustrating and pointless.
> Identify your organization's DNS owner and determine what registered DNS names you have available on the network that will host Active Directory.
> If you do not have a registered domain name, you should register a name with an Internet DNS registration authority.
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb727085.aspx
>
Re: Why DNS in OS X 10.10 is broken, and what you can do to fix it
#20My opinion of Apple's software quality has decreased over the past few months.