Why DNS in OS X 10.10 is broken, and what you can do to fix it
1–10 of 65 posts
Re: Why DNS in OS X 10.10 is broken, and what you can do to fix it
#2Re: Why DNS in OS X 10.10 is broken, and what you can do to fix it
#3I am not so sure about reenabling mDNSResponder. This may cause worse problems.
Re: Why DNS in OS X 10.10 is broken, and what you can do to fix it
#4edit: anyone remember how broken DNS would prevent you from being able to completely login to GNOME? That is what this feels like.
Re: Why DNS in OS X 10.10 is broken, and what you can do to fix it
#5I had the " is already in use" problem, the safari not able to resolve any hostname and I could not use wake on demand for almost 2 years because of some bug. Maybe I am unusually unlucky but I agree that the quality of the last OS X releases has clearly got worse. The problem with apple software is that if it doesn't "just work" there is little to do about it. I am not so sure about reenabling mDNSResponder. This ma…
Re: Why DNS in OS X 10.10 is broken, and what you can do to fix it
#6All of the bugs cited have to do with ".local" domains. You should never use .local domains as IANA has designated this domain as a special use domain for Multicast DNS as part of IP Zeroconf and Bonjour. http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6762
Apple has also made this clear here: http://support.apple.com/en-us/HT203136
Yosemite has split the job of unicast and multicast DNS up such that you cannot resolve single-label .local domains with unicast DNS anymore; you MUST use multicast. This is why hosts will resolve with nslookup or dig but not ping. The old behavior with mDNSresponder was arguably legacy backwards compatibility for unicast DNS resolution of .local hosts.
(I figured this out the hard way over a weekend using the Googles when my local VMs weren't resolving properly via dnsmasq - my fortunes changed when I looked into ".local").
There is one remaining problem with Yosemite DNS I haven't figured out yet, and that's getting unicast DNS resolution via dnsmasq while offline. Frustrating.
Re: Why DNS in OS X 10.10 is broken, and what you can do to fix it
#7Re: Why DNS in OS X 10.10 is broken, and what you can do to fix it
#8I had the " is already in use" problem, the safari not able to resolve any hostname and I could not use wake on demand for almost 2 years because of some bug. Maybe I am unusually unlucky but I agree that the quality of the last OS X releases has clearly got worse. The problem with apple software is that if it doesn't "just work" there is little to do about it. I am not so sure about reenabling mDNSResponder. This ma…
Their software has improved on the mobile front, it seems that's where all their engineers focus these days. It is sad that mac users long for the stability, speed and simple effectiveness of previous versions.
Re: Why DNS in OS X 10.10 is broken, and what you can do to fix it
#9This article is at best misguided. OS X 10.10 DNS is not broken, it is working as intended - just differently from the past. Standards have changed and many haven't noticed. All of the bugs cited have to do with ".local" domains. You should never use .local domains as IANA has designated this domain as a special use domain for Multicast DNS as part of IP Zeroconf and Bonjour. http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6762 Apple…
Re: Why DNS in OS X 10.10 is broken, and what you can do to fix it
#10I miss the Snow Leopard days.