Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's a ridiculous interpretation. It's the correct interpretation. People don't have an obligation to uncritically pass on any and all messages. True. That a publisher only publishes certain books is not censorship of all the other books. True. That you promote your own views without simultaneously mentioning all other views is not censorship. True. Freedom of speech means that you can put up your own lawn signs in…
Ah yes, the only possible reason somebody could disagree is failure to understand your perfect words. If my neighbor puts up your signs, I am allowed to express my opinions to him. If he decides to take down the signs, that is still not censorship. I'm even allowed to decide to not talk to him if he leaves them up. Exercising my right to freedom of speech and freedom of association is not censorship. It can't be, bec…
Your analogy is irrelevant. Your example neighbor is only putting up signs for one person, and you don't explain why he takes down the signs.
Censorship is selective removal of unwanted ideas to prevent those ideas from spreading. Removing all ideas for some other reason is not censorship.