I used to think society would, at some point, grow up and leave religion behind. But lately, it just feels like a far 'lower' form of religion is just taking over. I think that western christianity has made some big strides. For example, by leaving all the violence behind. Now the violent ones are winning. This makes me sad for the future of Europe.
Western christianity didn't leave all violence behind, see for example anti-abortion violence: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-abortion_violence#United_S...
Charlie Hebdo: first cover since terror attack depicts prophet Muhammad
471–480 of 489 posts
Re: Charlie Hebdo: first cover since terror attack depicts prophet Muhammad
#472The Charlie Hebdo attacks show that these days, real satire of Islam can't be done without significant risk of violent reprisal. If you doubt that statement, remember The Book of Mormon. (The play, not the actual book.) Could you imagine Trey Parker and Matt Stone making an equivalent Broadway play about Islam? Could you imagine them calling it The Qur'an to Google-bomb the original? Even if they disregarded their ow…
The story of the Mormons is a lot easier to make fun of though, and they are drop in the ocean compared to Islam (the second biggest religion in the world). Even so would you put that play on in Salt Lake City? I doubt there would be massacres but I expect there would be some form of defacement or attempts at suppression by fundamentalists. And it's not just Islamic religion that would cause this, exactly what you de…
Re: Charlie Hebdo: first cover since terror attack depicts prophet Muhammad
#473Earlier quoted context omitted.
I wouldn't consider France the vanguard of free Speech - For example holocaust denial is a punishable offense there. So free speech hasn't taken precedence over political correctness. It's just that criticizing or offending muslims is considered politically correct.
Correct. Also, it should be noted that Charlie Hebdo recently fired a contributor for mildly criticizing a powerful Jew: "Below is the full text which got the cartoonist Siné fired and brought before a court on charges of anti-Semitism. He was acquitted and later won a wrongful termination suit against Charlie Hebdo. "The back story was that Jean Sarkozy rear-ended a BMW driven by some random Arab guy. Instead of sto…
He later claimed to have been drunk.
Source: http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affaire_Sin%C3%A9#Radio_Carbone...
Re: Charlie Hebdo: first cover since terror attack depicts prophet Muhammad
#474Re: Charlie Hebdo: first cover since terror attack depicts prophet Muhammad
#475Re: Charlie Hebdo: first cover since terror attack depicts prophet Muhammad
#476Speaking on Today, [Omer el-Hamdoon, president of the Muslim Association of Britain] said causing offence “just for the purpose of offending” was not freedom of speech. Distancing yourself from the extremists [FAIL]
This isn't a 'fail'. Being repulsed by Charlie Hebdo's offensive depictions of religious icons does not imply being in favour of the assassination of its editorial staff. You can stand squarely against both, without contradiction.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8777831
A best actor nomination.
Re: Charlie Hebdo: first cover since terror attack depicts prophet Muhammad
#477Earlier quoted context omitted.
Race is an immutable characteristic. No one could possibly change their race. It's barely a valid concept. Holding someone responsible for an inseparable part of themselves is both ill-conceived and futile. Religion is software: adopt a baby from a family with a different religion and odds are that the baby will grow into an adult having your religion. It may feel like an inseparable part of oneself, but it is not: i…
Religion might be better analogised to firmware - installed early in the lifecycle by the manufacturers, difficult to replace; most end users would not do so or even consider doing so. If we look at someone who is born into a religion, lives their life holding those religious beliefs, and dies as a member of that same religion - is it valid to assume that they could have separated themselves from their beliefs? Just…
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8777831
A best actor nomination.
Re: Charlie Hebdo: first cover since terror attack depicts prophet Muhammad
#478Earlier quoted context omitted.
This isn't a 'fail'. Being repulsed by Charlie Hebdo's offensive depictions of religious icons does not imply being in favour of the assassination of its editorial staff. You can stand squarely against both, without contradiction.
Do you still think Cumberbatch was poorly cast in the Imitation Game? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8777831 A best actor nomination.
Re: Charlie Hebdo: first cover since terror attack depicts prophet Muhammad
#479Earlier quoted context omitted.
Do you still think Cumberbatch was poorly cast in the Imitation Game? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8777831 A best actor nomination.
Yes I do, but what does this have to do with Charlie Hebdo?
Re: Charlie Hebdo: first cover since terror attack depicts prophet Muhammad
#480Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes I do, but what does this have to do with Charlie Hebdo?
Well, I had no other way to point out that you turned out to be embarrassingly wrong.
Anyway, his performance in The Imitation Game is just personal taste, it's not a matter of right and wrong, we just happen to hold different opinions - nothing to gloat about!