Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's interesting. I wasnt directly suggesting it was reason to support a public plan btw. Just that it sounds pretty stinky. I also would add that I think you've got the wrong "problem". control costs by challenging doctors on what they bill, and at the same time not making it hard for people to get the services they need Is never an issue over here [UK] (not just because of the public aspect).
I think in the UK the insurance people tell the doctors what to do. But they hide it well, and it doesn't seem to cause a problem. (Or maybe it just doesn't bother the people as much, the US has a more independent culture.) Could a doctor in the UK prescribe an experimental treatment? Could he prescribe it and get insurance to pay for it? I bet not without a fight. Perhaps the difference is that there, the fight is b…
Yes, because insurance doesn't pay for it. You can get experimental treatment on the NHS - I think it is a little more of a hoop to jump through and depends on the actual hospital your at (for example most will insist other forms of medicine have been tried first).
Here doctors are a lot less litigatable as individuals; I think that is the main reason health care is better here. Without frivolous lawsuits and insurance companies breathing down their necks.