Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

0h h1 – A little logic game

0hh1.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

21–30 of 165 posts

Re: 0h h1 – A little logic game

#21

Post by couchand »

cokernel wrote: post #9
GuriK wrote: post #4

This is awesome, but tutorial seems slow and boring. Friendly reminder: launch iOS/Android version before someone else does

As far as I can tell, this is the same game as Unruly[0], which is included in Chris Boyle's Android port[1] of Simon Tatham's puzzle collection. EDIT: The history is a little more interesting than that. The janko.at page on Tohu wa Vohu[2] names many pre-existing variants: Eins und Zwei, Binary Puzzles[3], Binoxxo, and others. Binary Puzzles are notable for being paper-and-pencil puzzles, but it's not clear whether…

Wow that collection of puzzles is awesome, thanks for the reference!

Re: 0h h1 – A little logic game

#22

Post by zyrthofar »

zyrthofar wrote: post #17
Sarien wrote: post #13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Well, at least I'm not the only one who apparently didn't pay attention for half of the tutorial. :)

I didn't have any three-in-a-rows, nor identical rows. What rule are you referring to?

Oh ok, rows 3 and 6 are identical. I feel stupid now.

Re: 0h h1 – A little logic game

#23

Post by sp332 »

anon4 wrote: post #20
mankyd wrote: post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Rows 3 and 5 are identical.

Oh, right. But what about the ones on row 1?

Well if you switch the squares on row 3, you have to switch the square on row 1 as well. Otherwise the columns will not have even numbers of red and blue squares.

Re: 0h h1 – A little logic game

#27

Post by jtolds »

Clicking the top row seems broken sometimes. I suspect when I think I'm clicking a cell on the top row that I'm actually clicking the board size element ("4x4" or "10x10"), and it's not transferring through to the underlying cell.

Re: 0h h1 – A little logic game

#30

Post by anon4 »

sp332 wrote: post #23
anon4 wrote: post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Oh, right. But what about the ones on row 1?

Well if you switch the squares on row 3, you have to switch the square on row 1 as well. Otherwise the columns will not have even numbers of red and blue squares.

Oh. It's really confusing to show not only the current mistake but also the mistakes that would be introduced by fixing it.
Post reply on HN