Live data from Hacker News

Operator of Silk Road 2.0 Website Charged in Manhattan Federal Court

fbi.gov

51–60 of 264 posts

Re: Operator of Silk Road 2.0 Website Charged in Manhattan Federal Court

#51
Quote from http://www.irishexaminer.com/breakingnews/ireland/gardai-sei...

An international day of action to disrupt global activity on the Darknet and remove certain websites and forums is to conclude within the next 24 hours under the FBI/Europol operation codenamed "Onymous".

Re: Operator of Silk Road 2.0 Website Charged in Manhattan Federal Court

#52

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is assurance to the public that the law will be faithfully executed. They are assuring the public that the FBI is capable of investigating crimes even on the internet.

It would just be nice if they operated under the same judicial rules that they are enforcing. It seems like a large portion of US agencies (who enforce 'justice' in one way or another) these days feel like the same laws they are enforcing don't necessarily apply to them, especially when said law(s) limit their ability to do their job. Or more simply put, exceptional circumstances have now become a rule rather than an…

Specifically which laws did the FBI break in this investigation?

Re: Operator of Silk Road 2.0 Website Charged in Manhattan Federal Court

#53
post #39

"Benthall should have known that those who hide behind the keyboard will ultimately be found." What a weird tone...

The FBI exists to justify itself. An up-front, moralizing tone is reassuring to non-technically literate people who don't realize this is equivalent to tracing all of our most intimate conversations.

As it sounds like it was social engineering [e.g. Getting into the private/admin areas of the forum via an undercover agent] I'm not sure you can state that.

Re: Operator of Silk Road 2.0 Website Charged in Manhattan Federal Court

#54
Why couldn't the FBI land this case by itself? What are the responsibilities and special investigative powers (if any) of "Homeland Security Investigations." How do they justify their existence independent of the FBI? Their webpage suggests they do almost exactly the same thing.

http://www.ice.gov/hsi

Re: Operator of Silk Road 2.0 Website Charged in Manhattan Federal Court

#55
post #44
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm not so sure. There have been offshore gambling sites (sports, poker etc...) that have been shut down before with the cooperation of local authorities, although not always easily. They may see revenue for local industry as a nice plus, but not so nice as to risk the ire of the U.S. govt. In the end, your allies offshore may only be as loyal as the force they're willing to ignore. And your friends may only be as tr…

With TOR, though, it's very easy to move servers quickly. Who wants to play a foreign game of 'whack a mole'? Authorities will tire quickly of complying with an endless game.,

> Authorities will tire quickly of complying with an endless game

Oh I wish that was true but we are in our fourth? decade of the War on Drugs, Authorities don't care, they just hire more people at tax payer expense.

Re: Operator of Silk Road 2.0 Website Charged in Manhattan Federal Court

#56
post #32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

in all seriousness perhaps iranian hosts would be a viable route

I am not sure you want to stare down the Iranian justice system.

The US would never extradite to Iran, so unless you are so desperate to open a "dark net market" that you move to Iran, you will stare down the US justice system, not the Iranian tribunals.

Re: Operator of Silk Road 2.0 Website Charged in Manhattan Federal Court

#57
post #39

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The FBI exists to justify itself. An up-front, moralizing tone is reassuring to non-technically literate people who don't realize this is equivalent to tracing all of our most intimate conversations.

As it sounds like it was social engineering [e.g. Getting into the private/admin areas of the forum via an undercover agent] I'm not sure you can state that.

Sorry, I meant it in terms of the ominous "nobody is safe behind a keyboard"—not only do they seem to be proud to be so invasive, but they're even adopting a moralizing tone.

Re: Operator of Silk Road 2.0 Website Charged in Manhattan Federal Court

#58
What are the chances that the FBI set up a number of "copy-cat-silk-road" hidden services, immediately after seizing the original? That would provide them ample opportunity to 1) build a profile of everyone who used them, then 2) shut them down with an intimidating "sting," dampening the desire of potential copy-copy-cats.

Re: Operator of Silk Road 2.0 Website Charged in Manhattan Federal Court

#59
post #24
post #21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In which the purpose of the press release (and bust) is revealed: to threaten the public and make an example. The usual stuff you expect out of an upstanding agent of democracy.

Shame on the US government for threatening the public with the enforcement of its own laws.

By "its" do you mean the "public" or the US government? These are the government's laws, and it enforces those laws on said public.

Re: Operator of Silk Road 2.0 Website Charged in Manhattan Federal Court

#60
post #32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

in all seriousness perhaps iranian hosts would be a viable route

I am not sure you want to stare down the Iranian justice system.

If you don't live in Iran, staring down the Iranian justice system [given the lack of love other nations have for them] is pretty easy.

Tbh tho, I wouldn't be surprised if you setup an Iranian site that you weren't accused of "funding terrorist operations" and the trial gets replaced with a US drone strike.

Post reply on HN