Live data from Hacker News

Lime Text: Open Source Sublime Text clone

limetext.org

71–80 of 251 posts

Re: Lime Text: Open Source Sublime Text clone

#71

If this can print, I'll move over when it's read. I adore Sublime Text but having to c&p out of it to print is a bit of an annoyance for me. Otherwise it's a perfect app, I adore it.

Out of interest, what do you print code from Sublime? Interested in hearing why you need to print code, if that's the case.

Re: Lime Text: Open Source Sublime Text clone

#72
post #33

Always good with more editors. But i think that Atom will be the next sublime.

Please go into more details why you think that. After the first buzz of the semi open beta I didn't hear _anything_ about Atom. And last time I checked it only worked on Mac and I couldn't even compile it myself on Linux. Beside having a great idea it is also important how a project is executed.

Compiling on Linux is relatively easy now, though I still find Atom far too slow for everyday use. In my view it has a long way to go in regards to replacing Sublime.

Re: Lime Text: Open Source Sublime Text clone

#73
post #28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I suppose being open source doesn't stop you from giving user licenses for money, though. True, people can just use your program by violating your license. From coder to coder that is way less likely than, for instance, between the movie industry and the movie viewers, though. And being open source, even the violating users might add value to your product by fixing bugs and adding features.

> I suppose being open source doesn't stop you from giving user licenses for money, though. True, people can just use your program by violating your license. I don't follow your argument here. To qualify as "Open Source" rather than "source available", people have to be free to modify and redistribute the source code. So even if you charge for a license, there's nothing to stop the first licensee redistributing for f…

But most people are not interested in the source code, they'd like to get a binary.

Seems to work for XChat: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XChat#Shareware_controversy

Re: Lime Text: Open Source Sublime Text clone

#74
post #64
post #61

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> 60 bucks is less than an hour's pay for many/most developers WHAT? Where?

from the top of my head: UK, USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Netherlands, Germany, Austria, all of Scandinavia

I don't make 60 bucks an hour (not even 45 euros)..

Much sad :(

Re: Lime Text: Open Source Sublime Text clone

#75
post #63

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm pretty happy with TextMate 2 at this point - pretty regular updates, mature eco system, continuous improvement and its open source.

The TM2 phenomenon is something weird. TM had a huge traction when it was payware. Then it stalled, then it went open-source and everybody started looking for a new payware solution. Apparently some people, still believe the theory that all you need to know about a product is on the price tag , which is absolutely false (e.g. emacs/vim have no price but are exceptional programmig editors, hardly matched by payware so…

By my memory, the looking-for-an-alternative phase began long before the surprise open-sourcing.

Re: Lime Text: Open Source Sublime Text clone

#76
post #39

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Sublime is dead. No one is actively developing it. No one has to "actively develop it". It's a fully capable editor. It has a great plugin framework and ecosystem. Pending some incompatible OS change, I can use it for the next 30 years (using ST-3 from the early alphas, and it has been rock solid). For comparison, I also use Vim, and it's not like I use any "new features" in Vim or anything. The most "current" feat…

"No one has to "actively develop it". It's a fully capable editor." People seem to forget this quite quickly, but what else is needed in ST3 right now ? Very little in my day-to-day experience that isn't either solved via a plugin, or mostly trivial. I'd prefer a much more stable piece of software rather than one that's having upgrades thrown at it every month to maintain an 'actively developed' project status.

I'm still using TextMate 1 for pretty much this reason. :)

The only features I'd really love to add to TextMate are the rmate remote launching feature (which didn't work for me when I tried TextMate 2 a couple of months ago) and syntax highlighting for Perl 6 (which as far as I know no editor has yet).

Re: Lime Text: Open Source Sublime Text clone

#77
post #64

Earlier quoted context omitted.

from the top of my head: UK, USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Netherlands, Germany, Austria, all of Scandinavia

I don't make 60 bucks an hour (not even 45 euros).. Much sad :(

You may be confusing your salary with what your boss charges clients. Or, it may simply be that you are from somewhere where the economy is different.

Re: Lime Text: Open Source Sublime Text clone

#78
post #19

If there is one app I've always been thrilled to pay for, it's Sublime Text. I've purchased and renewed the licence ever since v1 came out. While it may not be open sourced, you can see it was created with a lot of love for code and openness. Today there are thousands of amazing plugins to enhance it. And though I fully respect the open source initiative, I, for once, am very happy to support / give some money to a p…

I completely agree with what you say. Sublime is awesome and I don't mind paying money for closed-source software. What I do mind is, that the development seems to have stopped, and being closed-source nobody can move it forward but the original maintainer. It once again brings attention to the most important "bus factor" [0] [0] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bus_factor

If he doesn't want to/can't continue with development, he can always pull off what Blender did. Start a campaign to raise a certain amount of money and release source after raising it.

Re: Lime Text: Open Source Sublime Text clone

#79
post #44
post #30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, me too. The last time I looked it was only for Mac users, which is totally wrong for a HTML based editor. Didn't mind looking a second time (until I hear some great buzz, I guess). I'm also curious about this vim reimplementation some guys are working on. I'll go and check that out right now!

There is a build for Windows now. I've started using Atom along with Sublime and Atom is a lot more stable now.

You can use it the ppa and it's on AUR too. I use it on windows and on arch and it's fairly stable for something in alpha.

Re: Lime Text: Open Source Sublime Text clone

#80
Just for information. I was using sublimeText 3. I updated two weeks ago the last release (Build 3059) and even (Build 3062) and it crashes.. since I don't want to bother using a close thing that crashes. I switched to atom.io And so far It's way better than three months ago (It's now fast enough) And It's really getting traction on the plugin side also.. I don't think I'll ever come back to sublimetext. I even went back to emacs for one week.
Post reply on HN