Live data from Hacker News

Choose Firefox Now, Or Later You Won't Get A Choice

robert.ocallahan.org

31–40 of 316 posts

Re: Choose Firefox Now, Or Later You Won't Get A Choice

#33
post #13

I do use Firefox, through inertia, but honestly it's not a good browser. It consumes 50%+ CPU constantly. It uses huge amounts of RAM. It crashes from time to time. Every few months I end up losing all my open tabs permanently. There's no isolation (process per tab). And they keep making gratuitous changes to the UI that don't improve the real UI problems but do require searching through about:config to revert them.…

That's something I miss from running Linux: there were far more minimal browser options. - Midori http://midori-browser.org/ - GNOME Web https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps/Web - rekonq http://rekonq.kde.org/

For I use Linux, i find these browsers cool but you wont uninstall chrome and firefox. Only chrome and firefox work for ALL sites properly...

Re: Choose Firefox Now, Or Later You Won't Get A Choice

#34
post #17

As someone who switches browsers about every six months, I feel that Firefox is still quite a bit behind in terms of stability and performance. I mostly blame the single-process model, which makes crashes and hangups way more global than they should be in 2014. On Windows, there's also the 32-bit issue. On machines with 8+ GB of RAM, having all tabs share a 2 GB address space just doesn't cut it. Especially when your…

Multi process is coming soon, it will be enabled by default at version 35 in nightly.

I feel the same way about Firefox's performance. If it can be overcome, I'd not have a reason to touch Chrome again.

Re: Choose Firefox Now, Or Later You Won't Get A Choice

#36
post #16

This guy writes against Google world domination using Blogger. A good example of how to shoot down your credibility. But hey, he is a hacker. Looks like its out of a hackers reach to host your blog. But choose Mozilla. By the way isnt Mozilla like 90 percent financed by Google?

Google pays Mozilla to be the default search provider.

They actually get a bunch of Google search users from that deal and they don't pay a lot for the marketshare they got for it. If anything, Google wins with that deal.

Re: Choose Firefox Now, Or Later You Won't Get A Choice

#38
post #21

I've gone back to FF after using Chrome literally form the day it landed. I changed because of vimperator + the ability to theme the header slimmer (i'm on laptop 24/7). But frankly it kind of sucks a bit and I have to jump over to Chrome a lot because almost no videos will play in FF.

Can you elaborate a bit about how you've slimmed Firefox header? I am also working 24/7 on a laptop and I value my screen estate a lot so one of main reasons I dont use Firefox is that its header and tabs consume the largest amount of screen space from Chrome/Safari/Firefox trio...

In Vimperator you can do this:

  :set toolbars=nonavigation,notabs
(it will remove tabs and the navigation menu)

Re: Choose Firefox Now, Or Later You Won't Get A Choice

#39
If the premise here is that Google is the evil empire, why is Google still on the Home Page when running Firefox?? Apparently large sums of money can have an effect on ethics.

Obviously the underlying goal here is a plea for more FF marketshare, but it's a tad hypocritical if the message is to not use services from a company you're promoting yourself. That's do as I say, not as I do type stuff.

Re: Choose Firefox Now, Or Later You Won't Get A Choice

#40
A practical reason not to use Chrome is the chrome app store.

It's littered with garbage-ware. Outdated extensions, broken extensions and extensions with fucking ads. It seems like anything can get in and you don't know if it's broken until you test it yourself.

It's a mess. At least with Firefox addons you can expect a certain level of quality, especially with the vetted addons, and you know before you install it whether it;s likely to be compatible.

Post reply on HN