> Israel is a nuclear state
They've never confirm this, only that it is believe that Israel possess nuclear weapons.
> Culturally and historically, the state of Israel was established by the Allies post WW2. So there is a moral obligation as well for the Allies (US, France, UK, etc. etc.) to watch out for what Israel does today.
There shouldn't be any morale obligation at all when they, the Jewish people chose the spot to become Israel. We, USA, didn't assign it for them. US, historically, didn't even care about Israel when they were attacked, the British were the only one that really back them up. US ties between Israel are more powerful later on, so this statement is false in term of morality.
> Ultimately, Israel is a bastion for Western values in the middle east.
And yet they are condemn by the majority in the UN except for USA veto.
> Do you think ISIS will be more concerned with Israel (who have a military within marching distance), or with Europeans / Americans that they've sworn to destroy half-way around the world? Who will they attack first?
Total fantasy. This fantasy is also fear mongering, in term of "what ifs". Even if this fantasy come true, you don't think Nato or those US carriers that are station nearby isn't going to bomb them like Korsovo?
And how smart are they to operate nuclear weapons? How long will it take them to learn how to use it?
> Besides, if Israel falls, their nuclear stockpile will cause some major issues.
Once again fear mongering.
Let's look at it this way, they got nuclear weapon, so they got a free pass for their horrible behavior against USA? The President and John Kerry?