Live data from Hacker News

Looks by Dr. Dre

subtraction.com

61–70 of 123 posts

Re: Looks by Dr. Dre

#61
I'm not clear why Beats are so popular actually. I find socially it sends the wrong message for me, functionally not as great as Bose or BW, and a bit too big + plastic for my taste.

Re: Looks by Dr. Dre

#62
post #41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

" Next time you roll into a Best Buy, compare the 'shinyness' and 'smoothness' of Beats to any other product " Yeah...just don't compare the sound.

Audiophiles almost unanimously agree that Beats headphones are sub-par when it comes to overall quality of sound.

Does Apple care what audiophiles think? iPods and the default ear buds are low quality compared to most audiophile gear.

Re: Looks by Dr. Dre

#63
Maybe Tim Cook can just start buying companies and wait for other people to figure out what to do with them. It's certainly interesting to see how many people think that Apple is infallible. They make mistakes just like any other company.

Re: Looks by Dr. Dre

#64
post #41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

" Next time you roll into a Best Buy, compare the 'shinyness' and 'smoothness' of Beats to any other product " Yeah...just don't compare the sound.

Audiophiles almost unanimously agree that Beats headphones are sub-par when it comes to overall quality of sound.

Audiophiles basically agree that ears are sub-par

Re: Looks by Dr. Dre

#65
post #2

The more closely you look at Beats, the more they make sense as a serious asset to a consumer electronics company, and the less plausible the "Apple just needed to get a streaming service off the ground" story is. Two more angles to consider: * Owning Beats puts Apple hardware on the heads of a huge fraction of every mobile user, whether they use iOS or not. Having a Beats brand affinity for those users makes it easi…

My theory on confusion over the Beats purchase is that Apple fanboys have a reluctance to admit that Apple is significantly a fashion company. Not the beacon of technical excellence(asterisk) they set it up to be in their mind. The reality is that Beats is also primarily a fashion company. Also with a strong brand. Also with a product line that sells at a high markup. They go together like pancakes and maple syrup. I…

>Apple is significantly a fashion company

Which fashion companies design their own programming language, design their own CPUs, lead the industry in hardware manufacturing, produce innovative security features like TouchID etc. None. They are a product and services company who care about design. It really isn't hard to see that they contribute just as much to the IT industry as Microsoft or Google.

Re: Looks by Dr. Dre

#66
I have experience in getting high-end plastic boxes manufactured (some in US, and increasingly in China because of price dynamics). Believe me, it is not a big deal. The variations are all commodity - you may have to get different molds made and finish made, but they will work will all different types of plastics. The plastics are already colored when in the pellet form (i.e., you dont paint on them) so colors variations are trivial to achieve.

Re: Looks by Dr. Dre

#67
post #25
post #2

The more closely you look at Beats, the more they make sense as a serious asset to a consumer electronics company, and the less plausible the "Apple just needed to get a streaming service off the ground" story is. Two more angles to consider: * Owning Beats puts Apple hardware on the heads of a huge fraction of every mobile user, whether they use iOS or not. Having a Beats brand affinity for those users makes it easi…

> Owning Beats puts Apple hardware on the heads of a huge fraction of every mobile user You might be on to something here. What if Apple's plan is to make the headphone itself a network enabled device with access to the app store? While headphones are currently 'dumb', there's no reason it has to continue to be the case. Network enabled watches. Network enabled headphones. Network enabled glasses. If Apple get's the…

high-margin headphones and iPods are complimentary products, integrating an iPod into Beats is essentially making an iPod free - which is a good thing if you own Beats

Re: Looks by Dr. Dre

#68
post #41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

" Next time you roll into a Best Buy, compare the 'shinyness' and 'smoothness' of Beats to any other product " Yeah...just don't compare the sound.

Audiophiles almost unanimously agree that Beats headphones are sub-par when it comes to overall quality of sound.

Source: http://www.audiocheck.net/soundtests_headphones.php

But me, I use the cheapest Panasonic headphones because they look cool and they're durable, and that's good enough for me. Probably for a lot of people. These: http://www.cnet.com/products/panasonic-rp-htx7-white/

Re: Looks by Dr. Dre

#69
post #43
post #28

While I don't disagree with anything in the article, I think it, and most commentators, are thinking too small. When thinking about wearable computing, one big challenge is to take a small, weird-shaped form factor, like sunglasses or watches, and cram enough computer hardware in there to support all the features that people want. Why not stick a computer in the headphones? Between the earmuffs and the headband, ther…

A bluetooth connection to the phone would be a much better option in my opinion.

Not necessarily BT, but I totally agree with the premise. There's a limit to the number of CPUs, SSDs, and OSs a person wants to carry and manage. By all means, carry displays and HIDs of all sorts and sizes, but please drive them all from my "phone".

I think this concept carries all the way to "laptops" which are nothing more than a few ounces of battery, screen, keyboard, trackpad and a radio. Just a few more generations till Apple can "do it right" and they'll deploy the tech.

I guess the only "problem" is such a laptop wouldn't become obsolete fast enough...

Re: Looks by Dr. Dre

#70
post #57

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My theory on confusion over the Beats purchase is that Apple fanboys have a reluctance to admit that Apple is significantly a fashion company. Not the beacon of technical excellence(asterisk) they set it up to be in their mind. The reality is that Beats is also primarily a fashion company. Also with a strong brand. Also with a product line that sells at a high markup. They go together like pancakes and maple syrup. I…

You're a smug asshole, aren't you. The reason they are so successful is the technology falls by the wayside; that's how advanced they are. Just because you get off rooting your phone doesn't mean they're not the leaders in technical excellence.

Personal attacks are not welcome on HN.
Post reply on HN