Live data from Hacker News

Adblock Plus gives Facebook users a way to block its extended tracking efforts

tech.eu

21–30 of 116 posts

Re: Adblock Plus gives Facebook users a way to block its extended tracking efforts

#21
post #13

I recently switched from Adblock Plus to HTTP Switchboard[0]. I find it gives you much better control over what gets blocked, and it properly blocks what you have told it to, not just hide them. I have it set up in quite a restrictive way so by default a site level scope is created and only image/css is allowed. It means I have to take anywhere from a couple of seconds to a few minutes to enable things a site needs t…

Not (yet) available for Firefox, sorrily.

That is true, and something I forgot to mention in my original comment. I do believe the author intends to eventually have it work on Firefox, but I doubt that will be any time soon due to the fact it currently relies heavily on the Chrome API.

Re: Adblock Plus gives Facebook users a way to block its extended tracking efforts

#22
post #14

AdBlock Plus once blocked Google ads, till Google decided to pay them [0] to "whitelist" their ads by default. The cynical part of me sees this as a precursor for AdBlock to sign a deal with Facebook and let their ads/tracking through too, for a price of course. [0] http://www.theverge.com/2013/7/5/4496852/adblock-plus-eye-go...

AdBlock Plus wants to encourage non obtrusive advertising. Anyone can apply to have their ads/website added to the acceptable-ads whitelist. Larger companies are charged a maintenance fee.

There is a single checkbox in the options to toggle the whitelist, as well as a link to filter list being used and documentation.

Source: https://adblockplus.org/en/acceptable-ads

Re: Adblock Plus gives Facebook users a way to block its extended tracking efforts

#24
post #17

Someone should make a plugin that actively sends facebook false tracking information along with your own.

Now that's a funny idea. Instead of just opting out you can poison the tracking info pool which basically invalidates any of the data they get even the legitimate stuff.

Re: Adblock Plus gives Facebook users a way to block its extended tracking efforts

#25
post #18
post #14

AdBlock Plus once blocked Google ads, till Google decided to pay them [0] to "whitelist" their ads by default. The cynical part of me sees this as a precursor for AdBlock to sign a deal with Facebook and let their ads/tracking through too, for a price of course. [0] http://www.theverge.com/2013/7/5/4496852/adblock-plus-eye-go...

If you want to disable the "Allow some non-intrusive advertising", that option is available.

Or just use the other one: https://getadblock.com/

Re: Adblock Plus gives Facebook users a way to block its extended tracking efforts

#26
post #14

AdBlock Plus once blocked Google ads, till Google decided to pay them [0] to "whitelist" their ads by default. The cynical part of me sees this as a precursor for AdBlock to sign a deal with Facebook and let their ads/tracking through too, for a price of course. [0] http://www.theverge.com/2013/7/5/4496852/adblock-plus-eye-go...

just use adblock edge :

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/adblock-edge/

Re: Adblock Plus gives Facebook users a way to block its extended tracking efforts

#27

I recently switched from Adblock Plus to HTTP Switchboard[0]. I find it gives you much better control over what gets blocked, and it properly blocks what you have told it to, not just hide them. I have it set up in quite a restrictive way so by default a site level scope is created and only image/css is allowed. It means I have to take anywhere from a couple of seconds to a few minutes to enable things a site needs t…

Initial ad blocking extensions for Chrome used element hiding due to addon limitations in Chrome. But for at least the last few years Chrome allows extensions to block requests.

I think Firefox has always been able to do this.

Re: Adblock Plus gives Facebook users a way to block its extended tracking efforts

#28
post #23

I take it Ghostery takes care of it as well. Does anybody know?

I can't speak for Ghostery, but when false positives on webpages occur its easier to debug and fix issues in Adblock Plus.

Debugging as a user or developer? It literally takes a single click to disable a specific tracker for a specific site or to disable tracking globally to see if Ghostery broke something.

Re: Adblock Plus gives Facebook users a way to block its extended tracking efforts

#29

I take it Ghostery takes care of it as well. Does anybody know?

Its a bit old, but Adblock Plus lists rank pretty well for privacy; http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/6730 also another comparson; https://github.com/gorhill/httpswitchboard/wiki/How-does-HTT...

Re: Adblock Plus gives Facebook users a way to block its extended tracking efforts

#30
This is part of the better long-term solution for online privacy. Spend the effort to educate users about privacy and tracking and build easy to use software options, rather than investing time in standards that don't get adopted and are based on trust.

The voluntary standards were never going to work since the interests of the parties involved are diametrically opposed. The voluntary systems only work for the ad companies if a very small number of users take up the option and if privacy remains a niche issue. As soon as developers looked to apply DNT broadly, they baulked.

Trust is also an issue. Facebook previously said that although their share buttons are hosted on the same domain as facebook.com, meaning cookies are sent - that they are not storing or tracking user web browsing data. They now are using that data, and very little was made of the reversal.

The same reversal or business changes could turn on DNT in the same way. With DNT the sites still receive the cookies and can still store the data. They are able to comply with DNT for a period and then later reverse their position and still use the old data for targeting (and a DNT header is one more data bit that says a lot about a user).

There are now a number of competing opt out standards. None of them really work and they each have problems, but companies need to be able to say they let users opt out whenever they announce a new tech that encroaches further into our lives (Facebook use aboutads, the NAI has their own, Google has its own, most of the aggregators have their own, there are other efforts to sync opt-out).

The solution is to cut the problem off at the head and solve it with software. Browsers and that are easy to use in terms of specifying who you trust (like installing an app) and that don't ever make third-party requests by default. Now that the pretense of negotiating a solution has been dropped, effort can go into developing better software control for users and tech solutions - since none of the current offerings are perfect (which is excusable).

Post reply on HN