I recently switched from Adblock Plus to HTTP Switchboard[0]. I find it gives you much better control over what gets blocked, and it properly blocks what you have told it to, not just hide them. I have it set up in quite a restrictive way so by default a site level scope is created and only image/css is allowed. It means I have to take anywhere from a couple of seconds to a few minutes to enable things a site needs t…
Not (yet) available for Firefox, sorrily.
Adblock Plus gives Facebook users a way to block its extended tracking efforts
21–30 of 116 posts
Re: Adblock Plus gives Facebook users a way to block its extended tracking efforts
#22AdBlock Plus once blocked Google ads, till Google decided to pay them [0] to "whitelist" their ads by default. The cynical part of me sees this as a precursor for AdBlock to sign a deal with Facebook and let their ads/tracking through too, for a price of course. [0] http://www.theverge.com/2013/7/5/4496852/adblock-plus-eye-go...
There is a single checkbox in the options to toggle the whitelist, as well as a link to filter list being used and documentation.
Re: Adblock Plus gives Facebook users a way to block its extended tracking efforts
#23I take it Ghostery takes care of it as well. Does anybody know?
Re: Adblock Plus gives Facebook users a way to block its extended tracking efforts
#24Someone should make a plugin that actively sends facebook false tracking information along with your own.
Re: Adblock Plus gives Facebook users a way to block its extended tracking efforts
#25AdBlock Plus once blocked Google ads, till Google decided to pay them [0] to "whitelist" their ads by default. The cynical part of me sees this as a precursor for AdBlock to sign a deal with Facebook and let their ads/tracking through too, for a price of course. [0] http://www.theverge.com/2013/7/5/4496852/adblock-plus-eye-go...
If you want to disable the "Allow some non-intrusive advertising", that option is available.
Re: Adblock Plus gives Facebook users a way to block its extended tracking efforts
#26AdBlock Plus once blocked Google ads, till Google decided to pay them [0] to "whitelist" their ads by default. The cynical part of me sees this as a precursor for AdBlock to sign a deal with Facebook and let their ads/tracking through too, for a price of course. [0] http://www.theverge.com/2013/7/5/4496852/adblock-plus-eye-go...
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/adblock-edge/
Re: Adblock Plus gives Facebook users a way to block its extended tracking efforts
#27I recently switched from Adblock Plus to HTTP Switchboard[0]. I find it gives you much better control over what gets blocked, and it properly blocks what you have told it to, not just hide them. I have it set up in quite a restrictive way so by default a site level scope is created and only image/css is allowed. It means I have to take anywhere from a couple of seconds to a few minutes to enable things a site needs t…
I think Firefox has always been able to do this.
Re: Adblock Plus gives Facebook users a way to block its extended tracking efforts
#28I take it Ghostery takes care of it as well. Does anybody know?
I can't speak for Ghostery, but when false positives on webpages occur its easier to debug and fix issues in Adblock Plus.
Re: Adblock Plus gives Facebook users a way to block its extended tracking efforts
#29I take it Ghostery takes care of it as well. Does anybody know?
Re: Adblock Plus gives Facebook users a way to block its extended tracking efforts
#30The voluntary standards were never going to work since the interests of the parties involved are diametrically opposed. The voluntary systems only work for the ad companies if a very small number of users take up the option and if privacy remains a niche issue. As soon as developers looked to apply DNT broadly, they baulked.
Trust is also an issue. Facebook previously said that although their share buttons are hosted on the same domain as facebook.com, meaning cookies are sent - that they are not storing or tracking user web browsing data. They now are using that data, and very little was made of the reversal.
The same reversal or business changes could turn on DNT in the same way. With DNT the sites still receive the cookies and can still store the data. They are able to comply with DNT for a period and then later reverse their position and still use the old data for targeting (and a DNT header is one more data bit that says a lot about a user).
There are now a number of competing opt out standards. None of them really work and they each have problems, but companies need to be able to say they let users opt out whenever they announce a new tech that encroaches further into our lives (Facebook use aboutads, the NAI has their own, Google has its own, most of the aggregators have their own, there are other efforts to sync opt-out).
The solution is to cut the problem off at the head and solve it with software. Browsers and that are easy to use in terms of specifying who you trust (like installing an app) and that don't ever make third-party requests by default. Now that the pretense of negotiating a solution has been dropped, effort can go into developing better software control for users and tech solutions - since none of the current offerings are perfect (which is excusable).