This doesnt make sense. You are paying for renting the antenna. You're not paying for the content.
How exactly does Aereo work? You rent an antenna from them, they record the show for you, and you can play it back at a later time?
Supreme court: Aereo is violating copyright law [pdf]
21–30 of 398 posts
Re: Supreme court: Aereo is violating copyright law [pdf]
#22The decision is limited to the question of whether Aereo violated the networks' "exclusive right" to "perform" their programs "publicly." The dissent (Scalia, Alido, and Thomas) believe that Aereo did not "perform" at all. They believe that when an Aereo subscriber logs in and clicks the play button, that the subscriber, not Aereo, is doing that performing. EDIT: Please note that the dissent would not have necessaril…
Re: Supreme court: Aereo is violating copyright law [pdf]
#23More from Scalia's dissent: "The Court vows that its ruling will not affect cloud-storage providers and cable-television systems, but it cannot deliver on that promise given the imprecision of its result-driven rule."
Re: Supreme court: Aereo is violating copyright law [pdf]
#24Re: Supreme court: Aereo is violating copyright law [pdf]
#25The Supreme Court is wrong- the reason cable companies are treated as a 'public' performance of a work is that their distribution medium is shared- any subscriber can tune into that broadcasting of that work over a shared common carrier where one copy of the work is transmitted and many subscribers can view it. Aereo is different in that it only transmits the signal captured to a single subscriber at a time, removing…
It's not the decision I'd hoped for, nor the one I'd make, but it's nonsense to claim that it's "wrong". All we can do about it now is to get the law changed.
Re: Supreme court: Aereo is violating copyright law [pdf]
#26Re: Supreme court: Aereo is violating copyright law [pdf]
#27Justices Breyer, Roberts, Kennedy, Ginsburg, Sotomayor and Kagan were the majority. It isn't over since the case now goes back to the lower court, but Aereo can no longer argue they are the same as a person putting an antenna on their roof.
Re: Supreme court: Aereo is violating copyright law [pdf]
#28Re: Supreme court: Aereo is violating copyright law [pdf]
#29At least this time it isn't such a direct attack on the "common people"
Re: Supreme court: Aereo is violating copyright law [pdf]
#30Justices Breyer, Roberts, Kennedy, Ginsburg, Sotomayor and Kagan were the majority. It isn't over since the case now goes back to the lower court, but Aereo can no longer argue they are the same as a person putting an antenna on their roof.
So, all the "liberal" judges? Sucks that the ones who usually defend human rights are also the same people who stifle innovation.