Live data from Hacker News

Supreme court: Aereo is violating copyright law [pdf]

supremecourt.gov

21–30 of 398 posts

Re: Supreme court: Aereo is violating copyright law [pdf]

#21
post #4

This doesnt make sense. You are paying for renting the antenna. You're not paying for the content.

How exactly does Aereo work? You rent an antenna from them, they record the show for you, and you can play it back at a later time?

They work like a DVR, you can set a show to record and it will save a copy just for you using your antenna.

Re: Supreme court: Aereo is violating copyright law [pdf]

#22
post #12

The decision is limited to the question of whether Aereo violated the networks' "exclusive right" to "perform" their programs "publicly." The dissent (Scalia, Alido, and Thomas) believe that Aereo did not "perform" at all. They believe that when an Aereo subscriber logs in and clicks the play button, that the subscriber, not Aereo, is doing that performing. EDIT: Please note that the dissent would not have necessaril…

I'm reading the opinion now, and I would not have guessed that those particular justices would have made the ruling they did. Does anybody have insight into how this decision fits with the ideological views of the justices?

Re: Supreme court: Aereo is violating copyright law [pdf]

#23
Scalia's dissent likens Aereo to a "photocopier or VCR." He says the court's decision "will sow confusion for years to come."

More from Scalia's dissent: "The Court vows that its ruling will not affect cloud-storage providers and cable-television systems, but it cannot deliver on that promise given the imprecision of its result-driven rule."

Re: Supreme court: Aereo is violating copyright law [pdf]

#24
post #7
post #5

Down. Any mirrors?

http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/13pdf/13-461_l537.pdf this is still working for me.

This is what I see (connecting from the UK):

500 Internal Server Error

The server encountered an unexpected condition which prevented it from fulfilling the request.

Re: Supreme court: Aereo is violating copyright law [pdf]

#25
post #10

The Supreme Court is wrong- the reason cable companies are treated as a 'public' performance of a work is that their distribution medium is shared- any subscriber can tune into that broadcasting of that work over a shared common carrier where one copy of the work is transmitted and many subscribers can view it. Aereo is different in that it only transmits the signal captured to a single subscriber at a time, removing…

The Supreme Court is not able to be wrong on a matter of U.S. law. It gets to decide what that law means, not you.

It's not the decision I'd hoped for, nor the one I'd make, but it's nonsense to claim that it's "wrong". All we can do about it now is to get the law changed.

Re: Supreme court: Aereo is violating copyright law [pdf]

#27
post #9

Justices Breyer, Roberts, Kennedy, Ginsburg, Sotomayor and Kagan were the majority. It isn't over since the case now goes back to the lower court, but Aereo can no longer argue they are the same as a person putting an antenna on their roof.

So, all the "liberal" judges? Sucks that the ones who usually defend human rights are also the same people who stifle innovation.

Re: Supreme court: Aereo is violating copyright law [pdf]

#30
post #27
post #9

Justices Breyer, Roberts, Kennedy, Ginsburg, Sotomayor and Kagan were the majority. It isn't over since the case now goes back to the lower court, but Aereo can no longer argue they are the same as a person putting an antenna on their roof.

So, all the "liberal" judges? Sucks that the ones who usually defend human rights are also the same people who stifle innovation.

Describing Roberts as liberal is a great stretch
Post reply on HN