Earlier quoted context omitted.
I have no idea why people are voting you down. It must be out of pure utter ignorance with no practical experience in trying to do this. As someone who weight lifts naturally what you said is factually correct viz. (a) it is as easy as counting calories and eating at a deficit. (b) it's difficult to eat at a deficit and keep muscle mass because you're essentially low on fuel and your body has to burn something for en…
I didn't down vote, but saying that losing weight is easy is like saying playing the piano is easy. In reality, they are indeed both easy, but you need determination and time.
Obesity research confirms long-term weight loss almost impossible
51–59 of 59 posts
Re: Obesity research confirms long-term weight loss almost impossible
#52More recent studies involving low carb diets are encouraging. There is also encouraging research directly relating the number of servings of fresh fruit and vegetables to mortality. This article is more properly referenced and based on more resent research.
http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/nutritionsource/healthy-weight-f...
Re: Obesity research confirms long-term weight loss almost impossible
#53Change is hard. But the people who already did change one thing in their life are very able to change their health/obesity as well.
Re: Obesity research confirms long-term weight loss almost impossible
#54"We are biological machines" I tend to disagree with this definition. The function of a body might look like a 'machine', but that machine is made of trillions of small living beings (cells), all having the same properties as the larger organism - they need to breathe, eat and drink, they age and they multiply and each cell is a very specialised 'machine' in itself. So if you want to call the body a 'machine', then c…
> The obesity epidemic (and also cancers, cardiovascular diseases and many many other 'modern' health issues) are the consequence of humans tinkering with nature and our bodies. Cancers, cardiovascular diseases etc. are the consequence of humans living long enough to develop them, thanks to modern medicine (tinkering with nature and our bodies).
The advancement in medicine is remarkable - the elimination of most infectious diseases, the ER capabilities, etc, but we are taking medicine too far.
Medicine is brilliant at 'fixing' things, but now we have fixes for every possible unpleasant feeling in our bodies and that is taking it too far. I don't have the statistics now, but my guess is that most of the pills taken by people are taken to relieve symptoms (like headaches or fever) and they are usually totally unnecessary.
Re: Obesity research confirms long-term weight loss almost impossible
#55Just losing weight is fairly easy. Keeping low body-fat % while maintaining decent amount of muscle is what is really challenging.
Enter human psychology, "real life" (stress, kids, a job, social life, etc), and the fact that maybe you have 80lbs to lose. That, at a healthy pace, can take a full year to lose. Or 80 weeks (nearly a year and a half) if you go one pound a week. That's a long time to stick to a "diet."
That's why most people need to focus on a lifestyle change. A Diet implies short term in most people's mind, and that's why most people revert. Yay, I lost 80lbs, now let's start eating donuts for breakfast, McDonalds for lunch, and pizza for dinner again. It's trivial to gain weight. It's harder, much harder, to lose it.
FWIW, I'm a weightlifter. I've been as much as 50lbs overweight, lost that weight and kept it off for many years. I've also gone through the bodybuilding "bulking/cutting" cycle that was popular for so long (and maybe still is, I don't do that anymore), so I'm quite familiar with gaining 20-30lbs and cutting down again in cycles. So I know weightloss is straightforward and simple, but I totally disagree that it's easy.
Re: Obesity research confirms long-term weight loss almost impossible
#56Just losing weight is fairly easy. Keeping low body-fat % while maintaining decent amount of muscle is what is really challenging.
I have no idea why people are voting you down. It must be out of pure utter ignorance with no practical experience in trying to do this. As someone who weight lifts naturally what you said is factually correct viz. (a) it is as easy as counting calories and eating at a deficit. (b) it's difficult to eat at a deficit and keep muscle mass because you're essentially low on fuel and your body has to burn something for en…
See my post above. I have experience both in weightlifting and losing weight (not a whole lot, but 50lbs, which isn't something to sneeze at).
If you actually have experience losing significant weight and you think it's a cakewalk, I think I'd accuse you of being disingenuous.
Re: Obesity research confirms long-term weight loss almost impossible
#57Re: Obesity research confirms long-term weight loss almost impossible
#58I must say that I've been the 5-2 diet (intermittent fasting) for nearly two years and It has worked for me. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/5:2_diet
http://www.homeopathyworkedforme.org/ > In 2010, H:MC21 organised a lobby of over 250 homeopaths and patients, and handed in to No. 10 Downing Street a letter and the declaration "Homeopathy Worked for Me" signed by 28,112 people.
The difference that keeps IF sustainable long term is the freedom to eat, and on fasting days there's the hope for tomorrow.
There are lots of health benefits to IF as well: Dietary restriction has been shown to have several health benefits including increased insulin sensitivity, stress resistance, reduced morbidity, and increased life span
Re: Obesity research confirms long-term weight loss almost impossible
#59Earlier quoted context omitted.
Lots of research has demonstrated that most crack addicts (and alcohol addicts, and nicotine addicts) who try to quit relapse. I thought that was an accepted part of science. Why do you think it sounds kinda off?
It's off because something that is impossible denotes some sort of 'law of nature' that cannot be avoided, where as in reality it's more brain/willpower related.