mixi.jp lets you follow RSS feeds. It wasn't enough to save mixi.
A simple way Google could have avoided fucking up Google+
61–70 of 116 posts
Re: A simple way Google could have avoided fucking up Google+
#62If they would have allowed it to grow naturally and wouldn't have forced people to use it whether they wanted to or not attempted to make it more user friendly and intuitive the would have succeeded.
Re: A simple way Google could have avoided fucking up Google+
#63If anything, it would make RSS more compelling to those of us who never really liked the experience of any readers (Google Reader included). Personally, I see RSS as little more than food for web-robots to consume, metabolize, and excrete.
Re: A simple way Google could have avoided fucking up Google+
#64I do think Google is thinking about a new strategy, but when he says "Google is getting away from Google+" is just pure speculation.
The real deal is that we have gap. There is a distance in using so many tools. I post it on Twitter but i want that to appear on FB but not G+. Or whatever. I have RSS feed. I have photos I want to share but not indexed or shared on Google Plus. This is sure something a startup can take on. But this is where social network companies are failing to do well BECAUSE they all want everyone to join their platform and ONLY their platform.
Re: A simple way Google could have avoided fucking up Google+
#65Re: A simple way Google could have avoided fucking up Google+
#66That's not the biggest problem, to me. Google+ maybe has not hit the target usage stats google wanted, but even when you love google+, it's awkward to use. I'm a daily google+ user and quite like the product. But when it comes to publishing, it always feels a bit off. I don't have a single public identity. I'm a rails developer, a news addict, a french citizen and since recently, a 3d printer user. Recently, I decide…
You could even implement that with a metaphor that is used to address a similar problem in the real world. People will say something "I'm wearing my Engineers hat now" to make it clear that they are communicating from a particular viewpoint. Hats, and indeed Masks(where you see only the headgear and not the identity behind it), would be a great addition to Google+.
Are you working at Valve?
Re: A simple way Google could have avoided fucking up Google+
#67Re: A simple way Google could have avoided fucking up Google+
#68Earlier quoted context omitted.
I disagree. People who used Reader were early adopters and influencers. Perhaps it was only 8 million users from Reader, but they would have had a multiplier effect.
Maybe. But many of us are early adopters on Google+, because many of us are early adopters of all kinds of technologies. How effective have any of us been? I've got a ton of connections on Google+, but they're mostly other software developers or enthusiasts. All my real friends who are actually on Google+ created accounts and then apparently forgot they had them and never post. Probably because I'm the only person th…
Re: A simple way Google could have avoided fucking up Google+
#69Re: A simple way Google could have avoided fucking up Google+
#70Earlier quoted context omitted.
You could even implement that with a metaphor that is used to address a similar problem in the real world. People will say something "I'm wearing my Engineers hat now" to make it clear that they are communicating from a particular viewpoint. Hats, and indeed Masks(where you see only the headgear and not the identity behind it), would be a great addition to Google+.
Indeed. By the way, I think this has a lot to say about the "real identity policy" of google+. Do people really have a single "real" identity ?
But if your young and perhaps living an unbalanced life (everything is just about work) you might not see that.