Live data from Hacker News

iOS 7.1

apple.com

171–180 of 239 posts

Re: iOS 7.1

#171
post #123
post #10

And the biggest feature of 7.1 is that within a few weeks 4 out of 5 iOS users will be running 7.1. http://arstechnica.com/apple/2014/01/apple-80-percent-of-act...

Given that Apple still sells an 16GB iPhone (for some baffling reason) I wonder what percentage of users will not have the necessary 4GB of unused space. Anecdotally, Several of my officemates have had this issue.

[deleted]

Re: iOS 7.1

#172
post #123
post #10

And the biggest feature of 7.1 is that within a few weeks 4 out of 5 iOS users will be running 7.1. http://arstechnica.com/apple/2014/01/apple-80-percent-of-act...

Given that Apple still sells an 16GB iPhone (for some baffling reason) I wonder what percentage of users will not have the necessary 4GB of unused space. Anecdotally, Several of my officemates have had this issue.

Not sure that would be baffling - that's the model everyone I know has (including myself).

Re: iOS 7.1

#173
post #167
post #151

Earlier quoted context omitted.

iOS (well, software and hardware) security model blows Android out of the water in design ; in implementation, it tends to be much more bug free as well. It's the one area where you can clearly say iOS is superior to Android; openness is the one area where Android is unambiguously better than iOS.

Unfortunately Android is unambiguously not open. If you want to make an Android device, you must sign up to a restrictive contract with Google. There is an open source subset of Android called AOSP, which you can use as a basis for your OS, but Google prohibits these from being called Android. No Android system is open.

It's entirely better than iOS for openness. As an app developer, it's dramatically more open -- you can override the core functionality of the OS if you want (browser, mail, etc.); you can't on iOS.

I'm willing to tolerate the closed nature of iOS for better security and (personally) an interface/hardware I prefer. But stuff like blocking Bitcoin apps is making me question this.

Re: iOS 7.1

#174

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not upgrading until there's a working jailbreak.

I am still holding on to my iOS 6. I don't like all this watered down, colorless and flat UI experience.

Me too, and most apps are still compatible with iOS 6+. I am a fan of "skeuomorphism". As Steve Jobs died and Scott Forstall had to leave Apple. I am no so fond of Mr. Cook's and Ive's design choices. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skeuomorph#Arguments_for_skeuom...

Re: iOS 7.1

#175
post #173
post #167

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Unfortunately Android is unambiguously not open. If you want to make an Android device, you must sign up to a restrictive contract with Google. There is an open source subset of Android called AOSP, which you can use as a basis for your OS, but Google prohibits these from being called Android. No Android system is open.

It's entirely better than iOS for openness. As an app developer, it's dramatically more open -- you can override the core functionality of the OS if you want (browser, mail, etc.); you can't on iOS. I'm willing to tolerate the closed nature of iOS for better security and (personally) an interface/hardware I prefer. But stuff like blocking Bitcoin apps is making me question this.

This point is true, although I hesitate to use the word 'open' to describe that.

Android certainly gives apps more control over the user's device. Whether this is 'better' remains to be seen.

As an owner of a small quantity of bitcoin, I am personally irritated by the blocking of bitcoin apps, but I'd rather that than have my phone be part of a botnet.

Re: iOS 7.1

#176
post #167
post #151

Earlier quoted context omitted.

iOS (well, software and hardware) security model blows Android out of the water in design ; in implementation, it tends to be much more bug free as well. It's the one area where you can clearly say iOS is superior to Android; openness is the one area where Android is unambiguously better than iOS.

Unfortunately Android is unambiguously not open. If you want to make an Android device, you must sign up to a restrictive contract with Google. There is an open source subset of Android called AOSP, which you can use as a basis for your OS, but Google prohibits these from being called Android. No Android system is open.

What? I thought that only applied if you wanted google services on the device. Android itself is FOSS.

Re: iOS 7.1

#177
post #44

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"The amount of features and customizable options on Android is insane." That doesn't necessarily mean it's more advanced.

Out of the box, maybe not, but if you customise it, it can be orders of magnitude more advanced.

[deleted]

Re: iOS 7.1

#178

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Out of the box, maybe not, but if you customise it, it can be orders of magnitude more advanced.

> more advanced You keep using that word. I don't think it means, what you think it means.

> orders of magnitude

There is another one.

Re: iOS 7.1

#179

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You can't make the claim that a greater number of features makes something more advanced. Especially when many of them are poorly implemented one-offs on one model on one carrier for a few months before support and updates are cut off permanently. (Why the hell should something like screen sharing be a feature of one particular model?!?) In terms of actually working , the iPhone is lightyears ahead of huge swaths of…

Not really. I think the better term is locked out of the ancient CDMA networks of Verizon. Nexus series is GSM, which is used globally, except for Verizon in the U.S. Samsung (w/ Verizon) install so much bloatware on their new Android phones it is bordering ridiculous. Why would new Galaxy S4 users want an uninstallable NFL app? The Motorola and LG Nexus android phones are comparable to iOS in terms of actually worki…

I personally had a terrible experience with the Motorola Droid. It worked well initially but got progressively worse with each update. Crashed constantly. Every update added bloatware (CityID, Madden, etc..), very frustrating. I went running back to iOS (iPhone5) and can't be happier.

Re: iOS 7.1

#180
post #118

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The only bug I've seen is that the device would restart itself on occasion. There was a critical bug right when iOS7 came out where if you tapped define in mail or notes, it would completely freeze the app. Seems to be fixed now. Then again, I wouldn't say I'm a heavy user. I mainly use it to check on my mail, read some news, etc.

I've had my iPhone5 restart happen during a call in iOS7.0 - the call went along as if nothing had happened. Was it really a restart or just the UI (springboard) restarting?

Theoretically, both would be possible.

The cell phone modem is a separate hardware piece in your phone, it has its own operating system. The smartphone OS communicates with the modem over an interface usually using "AT" commands. The iPhone 1-4 had an cell phone modem design by Intel (GSM version, modem manufacturer got bought by Intel).

The iOS UI consists app(s), so it may crash and restart.

Post reply on HN