Live data from Hacker News

Girls and Software

linuxjournal.com

311–320 of 434 posts

Re: Girls and Software

#312
She will probably be glad to hear there's still young hackers out there who don't give a shit about this feminist propaganda.

I for one don't care what gender you are the rules are the same regardless of gender.

If i happen to have a complaint about your code or anything else for that matter and you happen to be a girl ...well what do i care?

On the other hand every girl in STEM that constantly complains about how awkward the guys are just outed them selves as not a hacker gir.

A real hacker girl knows that the guys are awkward but it's not intentional the just never bothered with social skills.

A real hacker girl also puts as much value into fasion and the likes like any other hacker which is to say very little at all.

So that well dressed and social girl in IT is most likely not really a hacker then again this is just a generalization and would gladly be proven wrong.

Hell if you happen to know someone like that i would love meet her that is quite rare.

The reality of people like us with a curious nature is the we never find time to learn social skills and fasion we're just too busy satisfying our curiosity.

I personally would love to have a better fasion sense but i really need to get that arch install working perfectly :)

Re: Girls and Software

#313
post #184

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Let see what findings the cited studies in the paper has to say: "teachers give boys greater opportunity to expand ideas and be animated than they do girls and that they reinforce boys more for general responses than they do for girls." (1994) "teachers who are made aware of their gender-biased teaching behaviors and then provided with strategies and resources to combat bias are better able to promote gender equity i…

I think that kind of research is interesting, but feminists are prone to jumping to conclusions. All sorts of things could happen in the classroom. For example, maybe boys raise their finger more often to ask questions (no idea, just an example). That could be a reason for "teachers giving them more time and space". No theory of discrimination necessary. Or maybe boys are dumber and need more help than girls - anothe…

Here's your answers

http://academics.hamilton.edu/government/home/government_375...

>But "feminist scientists" (deliberate ") WANT to see discrimination. As soon as they see any data that can be interpreted to support the presence of discrimination, the case is closed and no further inquiry is being made.

That's stupid.

> I have never seen anybody ask an employer why they pay women less.

There has actually been research into this too. Women don't negotiate as much as men. Women don't ask for promotions and raises as much as men. Women aren't recognized as much for their contributions as much as men. Women's achievements, capabilities and potential are seen as much less than men by society. This starts as young as babies even by their own mothers. Successful and competent women are perceived as unlikeable thus less likely to get a raise or rise in the career ladder. Women tend to have less confidence in their ability and thus might contribute to them not asking for a raise.

This is mostly due to subconscious cultural influences and socialization of women rather than outright discrimination.

Employers are also worried about a women taking maternity leave and being distracted by kids. They aren't worried about men being distracted by children.

http://www.learnvest.com/2012/04/11-things-hiring-managers-w...

http://press.princeton.edu/chapters/i7575.html

http://steinhardt.nyu.edu/scmsAdmin/uploads/006/923/Adolph,%...

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/womens-business/10269461/As...

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/she-the-people/wp/2013/0...

http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/unofficial-prognosis/201...

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2013/13/130519-women...

http://naturalscience.com/ns/articles/01-08/ns_slee.html

http://www.newsweek.com/why-parents-may-cause-gender-differe...

http://www.rcgd.isr.umich.edu/garp/articles/eccles95i.pdf

http://www.hrzone.com/topic/strategies/invisible-glass-ceili...

http://www.nature.com/scitable/content/chapter-9-workplace-b...

http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/usappblog/2013/09/26/gender-stereotyp...

http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1691736

http://nataliemanor.com/articles/leadership-confidence-many-...

http://www.nber.org/papers/w5903

http://www.theguardian.com/women-in-leadership/2013/oct/14/b...

In a study I can't find now people were given a story about a successful person, some people were given it with a female name and some where given it with a male name. Then they were asked to give adjectives to describe the person. The male name got positive adjectives such as "hard worker" "achiever" and the female name got negative ones like "pushy."

Re: Girls and Software

#314
post #291

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Please elaborate. There's no such thing as a "misunderstanding of feminism". Feminism hasn't been a coherent movement in decades. It's a highly stratified network of ideologies and schools, some of which are only vaguely united under the pretext of social justice, but which have radically different views. Some are even openly and proudly transphobic. I'd like it if we stopped pretending feminism is some zenith of civ…

Feminist thought is diverse, sure, but there are certain schools of thought that are by far more widespread. This article misrepresents those. I do not know any feminist, for example, who would ever think of telling a woman to dress more gender-appropriate. Such gender policing is abhorred and practically unheard of. It’s just so weird to read about that as some sort of feminist idea. Also, feminism is super-rad. Pro…

The most widespread one at the moment is postmodern feminism, which is a complete joke.

I don't know what exactly do you mean by "gender-appropriate", but there are feminist movements which embrace traditional ideas of femininity: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lipstick_feminism

I'm assuming by "super-rad" you're trying to say you're a super radical feminist. Good to see you're proud of your little ideology.

Re: Girls and Software

#315
post #51

Oooh, this was an icy stab right at the core. She's completely right: >Dump her in a situation that operates on different social scripts than she's accustomed to, full of people talking about a subject she doesn't yet understand. Then tell her the community is hostile toward women and therefore doesn't have enough of them, all while showing her off like a prize poodle so you can feel good about recruiting a females T…

When I became a teenager, I got wind that it wasn't something "cool" and got spooked. For someone as insecure as I was, having a hobby that I couldn't really "explain" to normal people was embarrassing. When I was a teenager, coding or being technical in general wasn't cool either, and most of the people who were involved were or at least seemed insecure and embarrassed. Perhaps the climate in middle / high schools h…

Mild autism.

Re: Girls and Software

#316
post #294

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> think that kind of research is interesting, but feminists are prone to jumping to conclusions. I'm afraid researchers in general are far to prone to jumping to conclusions. > As soon as they see any data that can be interpreted to support the presence of discrimination, the case is closed and no further inquiry is being made. That's not my experience with such research. On the contrary, there are usually a progress…

"That amounts to asking employers why they are breaking the law, which makes it a little tricky" Maybe you haven't noticed, but you are already assuming that employers are guilty. That kind of thing is exactly what makes me speak out against feminist articles all the time, because there are so many unspoken assumptions. What if they aren't and there is a perfectly reasonable explanation for them paying less to women?…

>What if the women just work less hours than the men (which seems to be the case)? >women more likely to stay home because they have lower wages. What if they chose a profession with lower wages because they knew they'd be staying home anyway? Or maybe they chose a less paid, but more fun job, because they don't need to provide for the whole family?

If you ever even paid attention to such studies you are trying to debunk you would realize that many take this into consideration and see that there are still differences in pay even though factors like that are taken into consideration very carefully. Even though the wage gap does lessen when those are taken into consideration.

>I suspect a lot of feminists don't have children yet, so they don't even know what it means.

Of course that is absurd. My mother is a feminist.

Then I just Wikipediaed list of feminist and it was not at ALL hard to find a bunch with children.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gloria_Steinem

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naomi_Klein

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lester_Frank_Ward

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jessica_Valenti

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kathy_Najimy

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lars_Ohly

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martha_Nussbaum

>To me, having witnessed my wife toiling in labor for hours, it seems ridiculous to send a woman right back to work after having given birth to her child

Nobody said women need to return to work after giving birth. The whole point of feminism is everyone has a choice to do what they want. They have a choice to go back to work, or stay at home. Or the man or same sex partner can stay at home if they wish too, without any problems.

>Also I suspect most wage gap studies neglect to mention that women automatically get half of their husbands income.

Of course that isn't what we are taking about. AT ALL. Not even close. We are talking about two people doing exactly the same job and one person getting paid less. Except it is two groups doing the same job and one group getting paid less. These are people who do equally well in their jobs.

>Are there even employers who pay their female employees less than the males?

Yes. Is it outright "I don't like women?" Probably not. See my last reply to you.

>But what if it is a privilege instead?

If you actually understood feminism rather than just blindly shot it down you'd understand that feminist just want women and men to be treated as equals. They want men to have the same opportunities to spend time with their children as women and the same opportunities to work as women without societal pressure. It's all up to the choices each individual and family wants to make for themselves. But if a women chooses to do labor in the job market she should be treated as an equal to men. That's all these feminist are saying. if she chooses not to have children, then she should also be respected.

People like to think of feminism as something that's a scary monster or something. It is simply the belief that men and women should be treated as equals. Feminism deals with men's issues too when they are unequal to that of women's such as in the realm of child custody.

Re: Girls and Software

#317
post #58

themade.org teaches free programming classes to kids. We've been doing this for 2 years now, and most of the time, our ratios are 50/50. Yesterday, in fact, we had 3 boys and 6 girls for our scratch class, then had 8 girls and 2 boys for our interactive fiction class, taught in Twine. Couple things we've learned. First, girls default to pair programming. They cluster, they work together, when they have a problem, the…

How do you get kids modding Minecraft? I suggested this a little while ago for a kid in my brother-in-law's Grade 8 class, but then regretted it because the tools for doing it seemed inaccessible to beginners.

Teach them JavaScript: http://scriptcraftjs.org/

Re: Girls and Software

#318
post #307

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The reproductive system in its uncivilized state is a winner-take-all system; polygyny is much more common than polyandry. As such, it is not enough to be in the middle of the pack as a man; one must excel. Guys are more tolerant of low social status the way that ML algorithms ignore noise: they're hoping that those currently at the top of the pack are at a local maximum, and they're willing to tolerate being low-sta…

Two points: Let's not bring pop-evo-psych into this unless you're going to post a pile of references to white papers backing up the assertions. A link to a pickup artist's blog does not increase the quality of your statements.

These don't seem like very controversial statements to me. Male risk tolerance and female risk aversion are very well documented, although of course proving causality is impossible.

And that is my blog, and I am certainly not a pickup artist.

Re: Girls and Software

#319
post #71

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> But with unlimited net access also comes extremely violent videos, social networks with all kinds of shady types hanging around etc... Those are all there in the real world, too. You can't protect kids from anything harmful or scary, nor should you. Stumbling across a porn or horror site is probably more traumatizing for the adult, anyway. It's like people have forgotten what it's like to be a kid! You've been told…

Really? Aside from rather extreme or contrived situations, the average person in the real world simply does not witness multiple graphic deaths or see thousands of women naked. Can we at least consider that there might be a psychological impact of the fact that in one afternoon you can see more horrors and more nudity than 99.999999% of the world would have seen in a lifetime two decades ago? That there is so incredi…

Thank you for posting this. Too me the most worrying aspect of it all is the dehumanization of the people depicted in these videos. It's a very short journey from 'people like me' to 'people not like me' to 'not people at all'. Much of the evil that has occurred thru out history happened because the people following the orders somehow justified their acts by considering the victims to be something less than human.

Re: Girls and Software

#320
post #313

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think that kind of research is interesting, but feminists are prone to jumping to conclusions. All sorts of things could happen in the classroom. For example, maybe boys raise their finger more often to ask questions (no idea, just an example). That could be a reason for "teachers giving them more time and space". No theory of discrimination necessary. Or maybe boys are dumber and need more help than girls - anothe…

Here's your answers http://academics.hamilton.edu/government/home/government_375... >But "feminist scientists" (deliberate ") WANT to see discrimination. As soon as they see any data that can be interpreted to support the presence of discrimination, the case is closed and no further inquiry is being made. That's stupid. > I have never seen anybody ask an employer why they pay women less. There has actually been resea…

"This is mostly due to subconscious cultural influences and socialization of women rather than outright discrimination."

And again your bias shows. What if there are natural reasons? Your assumption seems to be that women and men should act exactly equal, given "equality". What if that assumption is wrong? I already gave one example - women invest a lot of energy into child birth, so it seems natural that they have a higher preference, or rather privilege, to spend time with their children.

I can not read all of the studies you linked to. A lot of them are flawed anyway (I have read many of the like already). But in general I find it interesting. But when you find such a thing, like women asking for promotions less, why not learn from it and ask for a promotion?

I am not opposed to women trying to learn how to get ahead. Everybody should do that. I am opposed to unfairly blaming other people.

"Women's achievements, capabilities and potential are seen as much less than men by society."

This one for example is ridiculous. Can you point to the study that shows that? I can think of many famous women.

There is this meme going around of the female scientists who are supposedly cheated out of their fame ( https://plus.google.com/115858612877723984178/posts/Hphw8ErS... ). I looked them up on Wikipedia and the feminist story wasn't true at all. One of those women even had a chemical element named after herself (Lise Meitner).

The article you link to about boys in the classroom seems to confirm what I guessed, that boys demand more attention. There is not enough information in that article to form a real conclusion, though.

Post reply on HN