The title is a bit misleading though. Though it would be real cool, saying we can detect molecule size pattern does not mean we could read Braille alphabet on molecule size dots. The eye can detect nanometer size patterns: we can make the difference between blue light ( radiation with a 400 nanometers wave length ) and red light ( radiation with a 800 nanometers wave length ). Does not mean we can see nanometer size…
Fingers can detect nano-scale wrinkles even on a seemingly smooth surface
21–30 of 45 posts
Re: Fingers can detect nano-scale wrinkles even on a seemingly smooth surface
#22The title is a bit misleading though. Though it would be real cool, saying we can detect molecule size pattern does not mean we could read Braille alphabet on molecule size dots. The eye can detect nanometer size patterns: we can make the difference between blue light ( radiation with a 400 nanometers wave length ) and red light ( radiation with a 800 nanometers wave length ). Does not mean we can see nanometer size…
"The researchers found that the emission of only 90 photons could elicit visual experience. However, only 45 of these actually entered the retina, due to absorption by the optical media. Furthermore, 80% of these did not reach the fovea. Therefore, the human eye can detect as few as nine photons."
Re: Fingers can detect nano-scale wrinkles even on a seemingly smooth surface
#23The title is a bit misleading though. Though it would be real cool, saying we can detect molecule size pattern does not mean we could read Braille alphabet on molecule size dots. The eye can detect nanometer size patterns: we can make the difference between blue light ( radiation with a 400 nanometers wave length ) and red light ( radiation with a 800 nanometers wave length ). Does not mean we can see nanometer size…
If your finger was the size of the Earth, you could feel the difference between houses from cars
I think it would be easier to visualize this way:
If the Earth was the size of an orange, your finger could feel the difference between houses from cars
Re: Fingers can detect nano-scale wrinkles even on a seemingly smooth surface
#24Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes, that is already one of many options of haptic feedback being explored actually: > A new technique that does not require actuators is called reverse-electrovibration. A weak current is sent from a device on the user through the object they are touching to the ground. The oscillating electric field around the skin on their finger tips creates a variable sensation of friction depending on the waveform, frequency, a…
It seems that I've got years of experience with third generation haptic technology then. If you plugin a laptop into an outlet that is not properly grounded and move your fingers across metal surfaces of the thing, one can experience it first hand. A sensation of friction, like moving your fingers over ripples because of the current running through them. This should work with a lot of electrical appliances that have…
Re: Fingers can detect nano-scale wrinkles even on a seemingly smooth surface
#25Earlier quoted context omitted.
Simply put, glass is molecularly geometric - building actuated buttons into the glass itself isn't very probable. But a film of actuated buttons could be added much like with capacitive touch sensors today. Microfluidics is near the 100nm range today. Throw in a bit of ferrofluid and something like this is at least plausible. The challenge is in making all this transparent. The microfluidic channels would need to not…
You might also find this video [1] interesting. Although it's not clear how far this company has actually got with the technology. [1] http://vimeo.com/43431035
Thanks for the link.
Re: Fingers can detect nano-scale wrinkles even on a seemingly smooth surface
#26Re: Fingers can detect nano-scale wrinkles even on a seemingly smooth surface
#27Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes, that is already one of many options of haptic feedback being explored actually: > A new technique that does not require actuators is called reverse-electrovibration. A weak current is sent from a device on the user through the object they are touching to the ground. The oscillating electric field around the skin on their finger tips creates a variable sensation of friction depending on the waveform, frequency, a…
It seems that I've got years of experience with third generation haptic technology then. If you plugin a laptop into an outlet that is not properly grounded and move your fingers across metal surfaces of the thing, one can experience it first hand. A sensation of friction, like moving your fingers over ripples because of the current running through them. This should work with a lot of electrical appliances that have…
Re: Fingers can detect nano-scale wrinkles even on a seemingly smooth surface
#28The title is a bit misleading though. Though it would be real cool, saying we can detect molecule size pattern does not mean we could read Braille alphabet on molecule size dots. The eye can detect nanometer size patterns: we can make the difference between blue light ( radiation with a 400 nanometers wave length ) and red light ( radiation with a 800 nanometers wave length ). Does not mean we can see nanometer size…
I make telescope mirrors. The error I'm allowed is 100 nm. I would love to just drag my fingers over the glass and tell if something is not quite right with the optical surface. In reality, I need a pretty elaborate optical setup to amplify the errors about 1/2 million times, in order to see them.
I'm guessing the spatial frequency of the pattern in that experiment is on the same size scale like the vertical amplitude of it.
Re: Fingers can detect nano-scale wrinkles even on a seemingly smooth surface
#29The title is a bit misleading though. Though it would be real cool, saying we can detect molecule size pattern does not mean we could read Braille alphabet on molecule size dots. The eye can detect nanometer size patterns: we can make the difference between blue light ( radiation with a 400 nanometers wave length ) and red light ( radiation with a 800 nanometers wave length ). Does not mean we can see nanometer size…
As another (minor) clarification to the article, where it says: If your finger was the size of the Earth, you could feel the difference between houses from cars I think it would be easier to visualize this way: If the Earth was the size of an orange, your finger could feel the difference between houses from cars
2 nm Diameter of a DNA Alpha helix
4 nm Globular Protein
6 nm microfilaments
7 nm thickness cell membranes
20 nm Ribosome
25 nm Microtubule
30 nm Small virus (Picornaviruses)
30 nm Rhinoviruses
50 nm Nuclear pore
100 nm HIV
So 13 nm is on the scale of a very small virus... :)Re: Fingers can detect nano-scale wrinkles even on a seemingly smooth surface
#30We all just ran our fingers over our desk/keyboard/pants.