Live data from Hacker News

Fingers can detect nano-scale wrinkles even on a seemingly smooth surface

sciencedaily.com

21–30 of 45 posts

Re: Fingers can detect nano-scale wrinkles even on a seemingly smooth surface

#21
post #4

The title is a bit misleading though. Though it would be real cool, saying we can detect molecule size pattern does not mean we could read Braille alphabet on molecule size dots. The eye can detect nanometer size patterns: we can make the difference between blue light ( radiation with a 400 nanometers wave length ) and red light ( radiation with a 800 nanometers wave length ). Does not mean we can see nanometer size…

Well, we can feel bumps 13 nanometers high, as long as they are 760 nanometers long :)

Re: Fingers can detect nano-scale wrinkles even on a seemingly smooth surface

#22
post #4

The title is a bit misleading though. Though it would be real cool, saying we can detect molecule size pattern does not mean we could read Braille alphabet on molecule size dots. The eye can detect nanometer size patterns: we can make the difference between blue light ( radiation with a 400 nanometers wave length ) and red light ( radiation with a 800 nanometers wave length ). Does not mean we can see nanometer size…

We can also see a candle in complete darkness from 50 km away so just a handful of photos are enough for a sensation.

"The researchers found that the emission of only 90 photons could elicit visual experience. However, only 45 of these actually entered the retina, due to absorption by the optical media. Furthermore, 80% of these did not reach the fovea. Therefore, the human eye can detect as few as nine photons."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Absolute_threshold

Re: Fingers can detect nano-scale wrinkles even on a seemingly smooth surface

#23
post #4

The title is a bit misleading though. Though it would be real cool, saying we can detect molecule size pattern does not mean we could read Braille alphabet on molecule size dots. The eye can detect nanometer size patterns: we can make the difference between blue light ( radiation with a 400 nanometers wave length ) and red light ( radiation with a 800 nanometers wave length ). Does not mean we can see nanometer size…

As another (minor) clarification to the article, where it says:

If your finger was the size of the Earth, you could feel the difference between houses from cars

I think it would be easier to visualize this way:

If the Earth was the size of an orange, your finger could feel the difference between houses from cars

Re: Fingers can detect nano-scale wrinkles even on a seemingly smooth surface

#24

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, that is already one of many options of haptic feedback being explored actually: > A new technique that does not require actuators is called reverse-electrovibration. A weak current is sent from a device on the user through the object they are touching to the ground. The oscillating electric field around the skin on their finger tips creates a variable sensation of friction depending on the waveform, frequency, a…

It seems that I've got years of experience with third generation haptic technology then. If you plugin a laptop into an outlet that is not properly grounded and move your fingers across metal surfaces of the thing, one can experience it first hand. A sensation of friction, like moving your fingers over ripples because of the current running through them. This should work with a lot of electrical appliances that have…

Now that you mention it, I have that with my current laptop too! It has made me long for the days of plastic covers, something I did not think possible :).

Re: Fingers can detect nano-scale wrinkles even on a seemingly smooth surface

#25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Simply put, glass is molecularly geometric - building actuated buttons into the glass itself isn't very probable. But a film of actuated buttons could be added much like with capacitive touch sensors today. Microfluidics is near the 100nm range today. Throw in a bit of ferrofluid and something like this is at least plausible. The challenge is in making all this transparent. The microfluidic channels would need to not…

You might also find this video [1] interesting. Although it's not clear how far this company has actually got with the technology. [1] http://vimeo.com/43431035

@1m18s you see a syringe of fluid - so it's something similar. Maybe two laser-cut capacitive films with non-conductive fluid pumped through to make static 'buttons'. Probably a better MVP than what I suggested earlier :).

Thanks for the link.

Re: Fingers can detect nano-scale wrinkles even on a seemingly smooth surface

#27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, that is already one of many options of haptic feedback being explored actually: > A new technique that does not require actuators is called reverse-electrovibration. A weak current is sent from a device on the user through the object they are touching to the ground. The oscillating electric field around the skin on their finger tips creates a variable sensation of friction depending on the waveform, frequency, a…

It seems that I've got years of experience with third generation haptic technology then. If you plugin a laptop into an outlet that is not properly grounded and move your fingers across metal surfaces of the thing, one can experience it first hand. A sensation of friction, like moving your fingers over ripples because of the current running through them. This should work with a lot of electrical appliances that have…

I thought I was just imagining that area below the keyboard on my laptop sometimes feels rougher.

Re: Fingers can detect nano-scale wrinkles even on a seemingly smooth surface

#28
post #4

The title is a bit misleading though. Though it would be real cool, saying we can detect molecule size pattern does not mean we could read Braille alphabet on molecule size dots. The eye can detect nanometer size patterns: we can make the difference between blue light ( radiation with a 400 nanometers wave length ) and red light ( radiation with a 800 nanometers wave length ). Does not mean we can see nanometer size…

It's almost certainly all about the pattern.

I make telescope mirrors. The error I'm allowed is 100 nm. I would love to just drag my fingers over the glass and tell if something is not quite right with the optical surface. In reality, I need a pretty elaborate optical setup to amplify the errors about 1/2 million times, in order to see them.

I'm guessing the spatial frequency of the pattern in that experiment is on the same size scale like the vertical amplitude of it.

Re: Fingers can detect nano-scale wrinkles even on a seemingly smooth surface

#29
post #23
post #4

The title is a bit misleading though. Though it would be real cool, saying we can detect molecule size pattern does not mean we could read Braille alphabet on molecule size dots. The eye can detect nanometer size patterns: we can make the difference between blue light ( radiation with a 400 nanometers wave length ) and red light ( radiation with a 800 nanometers wave length ). Does not mean we can see nanometer size…

As another (minor) clarification to the article, where it says: If your finger was the size of the Earth, you could feel the difference between houses from cars I think it would be easier to visualize this way: If the Earth was the size of an orange, your finger could feel the difference between houses from cars

That still requires a pretty impressive feel for the relative size of oranges and planets though. I would have preferred something like this table:

  2 nm Diameter of a DNA Alpha helix

  4 nm Globular Protein

  6 nm microfilaments

  7 nm thickness cell membranes

 20 nm Ribosome

 25 nm Microtubule

 30 nm Small virus (Picornaviruses)

 30 nm Rhinoviruses

 50 nm Nuclear pore

 100 nm HIV

So 13 nm is on the scale of a very small virus... :)
Post reply on HN