So how would this tolerate an environment with lots of white-noise generators?
Scientist-developed malware covertly jumps air gaps using inaudible sound
21–30 of 60 posts
Re: Scientist-developed malware covertly jumps air gaps using inaudible sound
#22So how would this tolerate an environment with lots of white-noise generators?
Re: Scientist-developed malware covertly jumps air gaps using inaudible sound
#23Keep your headphones plugged in. BAM! Solved!
This just shows my ignorance with regard to this topic, but is the speaker cutoff from plugging in headphones always a hardware switch? I.e., can software override it and direct sound to the speakers even if one has headphones plugged in? Of course, if one were playing music or something, it would be obvious that the switch had been circumvented.
Re: Scientist-developed malware covertly jumps air gaps using inaudible sound
#24Keep your headphones plugged in. BAM! Solved!
This just shows my ignorance with regard to this topic, but is the speaker cutoff from plugging in headphones always a hardware switch? I.e., can software override it and direct sound to the speakers even if one has headphones plugged in? Of course, if one were playing music or something, it would be obvious that the switch had been circumvented.
Re: Scientist-developed malware covertly jumps air gaps using inaudible sound
#25Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's how it seems to me. But a well-hidden bit of malware won't have a problem turning on the mic for a few seconds on the hour every hour to listen for a handshake chirp or the like. It's a limitation, but far from an insurmountable one.
yea but then the malware has to already be present on both machines, eh?...
Re: Scientist-developed malware covertly jumps air gaps using inaudible sound
#26Keep your headphones plugged in. BAM! Solved!
This just shows my ignorance with regard to this topic, but is the speaker cutoff from plugging in headphones always a hardware switch? I.e., can software override it and direct sound to the speakers even if one has headphones plugged in? Of course, if one were playing music or something, it would be obvious that the switch had been circumvented.
Re: Scientist-developed malware covertly jumps air gaps using inaudible sound
#27Earlier quoted context omitted.
This just shows my ignorance with regard to this topic, but is the speaker cutoff from plugging in headphones always a hardware switch? I.e., can software override it and direct sound to the speakers even if one has headphones plugged in? Of course, if one were playing music or something, it would be obvious that the switch had been circumvented.
I honestly have no idea. My response was meant to be tongue-in-cheek, but whoever downvoted me seems to have missed my subtle sense of humor.
Re: Scientist-developed malware covertly jumps air gaps using inaudible sound
#28Keep your headphones plugged in. BAM! Solved!
This just shows my ignorance with regard to this topic, but is the speaker cutoff from plugging in headphones always a hardware switch? I.e., can software override it and direct sound to the speakers even if one has headphones plugged in? Of course, if one were playing music or something, it would be obvious that the switch had been circumvented.
Also consider that if you played the sound at maximum volume it might actually be audible some distance away from the headphones.
Re: Scientist-developed malware covertly jumps air gaps using inaudible sound
#29Re: Scientist-developed malware covertly jumps air gaps using inaudible sound
#30Earlier quoted context omitted.
In other words, the "target" computer has to be actively listening?
Yes. To call this result "unsurprising" would dignify it unduly.